Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6255027imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:56:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6g7Mng5IKessALv6lOtYFL/m4RPxFDXyPJJwR+63St0wp0/ev8bn0cwz5ULYpTwEBTD9xn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b83:: with SMTP id p3mr29850374plk.118.1548078991487; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:56:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548078991; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wf5EJxCeMKS5Hvy6RrfkjwZycXDby5yIoJXSiGEvKI9pzzvy+JhxEZY3T2CkoMU/hg 8FZ7Rl4A5w0Vq0UMrSREJAbLD3zUrcXGetZ6QlL3wpkQX8maqANVu2kzuRzWuOyuiIiJ 8t+GLUPxXVsUHzzEdZiyfJUatwe37oJRclIJyl9EzjCttLVSCF2hZ6AFxactg9LRndc1 qJlcTr/xcSUJfi6EDnIy3ISa1ogYVth1P4OA6jsUaMfh2lnBnZEOCpCi/sWgx4wC85fH sjZGSiVSn7xIrKIAKtI8V9FDitMbdfUThvCNE+hFEvJnLH71f2LxsfPtprPDkHT4LLiw GJbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=NsxjxGPMQbtFeINla8kK01Fd1hgDm5ymflbrsVW+Kxk=; b=dDQQbaDjWuXDMNB28HQiuXsrR63iBZBdIZUHmH2uNr6BNOYhOObt+xxgxmSrAUIW0k 8d2U6ze+bALxs1Vuns7+8k6FqKd9hrDsq37KnOlozd2Ed4MFfdj0IaiWZa7DjScxbLYf affiZg113qZOKSsSJGFpO2bmco6904ioPRdK1WbSV4ljLksuLeecz8lhSKI3TQRppvAT n8oKpFCbWXgu23E9TIXy4GhCVhoZJarIiwnna1PRZcJT1ecbmY+VC20Q+ZAy0wxm74HT vapD48sSp5IBmFWRUGyy04yfrz+2gx83p93lj4XUK2pIhNIqcubwBn16D63H3WQmYDNT v9ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="MwT/O0A2"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v69si13976614pgb.3.2019.01.21.05.56.16; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:56:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="MwT/O0A2"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731318AbfAUNxm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:53:42 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37524 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731314AbfAUNxk (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:53:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 160AD2084C; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:53:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548078818; bh=NMK30vXachz0MJwS6CAjNRIOxGMiuhYWeqlFBN6jX9o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MwT/O0A22eBveqsCs4lpQI9H/+YebxOnAYZaJx3jR+FP3ZRG9zHsd2iK3iiOHjDpV BB9b998TLJ8H2x7UHhsQpYmmbfNlInbHUMLGoK334ajFpdV0DbC/W8pEqRtuPYzzRs eXqekSgvvFLoLT3prtR8For8YZp7+iindj7XjnZw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , Jan Kara , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 4.14 54/59] block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation. Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:44:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20190121122502.991145626@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190121122456.529172919@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190121122456.529172919@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Tetsuo Handa commit 310ca162d779efee8a2dc3731439680f3e9c1e86 upstream. syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference [1] which is caused by race condition between ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) versus ioctl(other_loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, loop_fd) due to traversing other loop devices at loop_validate_file() without holding corresponding lo->lo_ctl_mutex locks. Since ioctl() request on loop devices is not frequent operation, we don't need fine grained locking. Let's use global lock in order to allow safe traversal at loop_validate_file(). Note that syzbot is also reporting circular locking dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and lo->lo_ctl_mutex [2] which is caused by calling blkdev_reread_part() with lock held. This patch does not address it. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f3cfe26e785d85f9ee259f385515291d21bd80a3 [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889 Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Reported-by: syzbot Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/loop.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- drivers/block/loop.h | 1 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr); static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex); static int max_part; static int part_shift; @@ -1018,7 +1019,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_devic */ if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) { lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR; - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return 0; } @@ -1070,12 +1071,12 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_devic if (!part_shift) lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN; loop_unprepare_queue(lo); - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); /* - * Need not hold lo_ctl_mutex to fput backing file. - * Calling fput holding lo_ctl_mutex triggers a circular + * Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file. + * Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular * lock dependency possibility warning as fput can take - * bd_mutex which is usually taken before lo_ctl_mutex. + * bd_mutex which is usually taken before loop_ctl_mutex. */ fput(filp); return 0; @@ -1180,7 +1181,7 @@ loop_get_status(struct loop_device *lo, int ret; if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound) { - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return -ENXIO; } @@ -1199,10 +1200,10 @@ loop_get_status(struct loop_device *lo, lo->lo_encrypt_key_size); } - /* Drop lo_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */ + /* Drop loop_ctl_mutex while we call into the filesystem. */ path = lo->lo_backing_file->f_path; path_get(&path); - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); ret = vfs_getattr(&path, &stat, STATX_INO, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT); if (!ret) { info->lo_device = huge_encode_dev(stat.dev); @@ -1294,7 +1295,7 @@ loop_get_status_old(struct loop_device * int err; if (!arg) { - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return -EINVAL; } err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64); @@ -1312,7 +1313,7 @@ loop_get_status64(struct loop_device *lo int err; if (!arg) { - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return -EINVAL; } err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64); @@ -1370,7 +1371,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; int err; - mutex_lock_nested(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex, 1); + mutex_lock_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1); switch (cmd) { case LOOP_SET_FD: err = loop_set_fd(lo, mode, bdev, arg); @@ -1379,7 +1380,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device err = loop_change_fd(lo, bdev, arg); break; case LOOP_CLR_FD: - /* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked lo_ctl_mutex on success */ + /* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked loop_ctl_mutex on success */ err = loop_clr_fd(lo); if (!err) goto out_unlocked; @@ -1392,7 +1393,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device break; case LOOP_GET_STATUS: err = loop_get_status_old(lo, (struct loop_info __user *) arg); - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */ + /* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */ goto out_unlocked; case LOOP_SET_STATUS64: err = -EPERM; @@ -1402,7 +1403,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device break; case LOOP_GET_STATUS64: err = loop_get_status64(lo, (struct loop_info64 __user *) arg); - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */ + /* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */ goto out_unlocked; case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY: err = -EPERM; @@ -1422,7 +1423,7 @@ static int lo_ioctl(struct block_device default: err = lo->ioctl ? lo->ioctl(lo, cmd, arg) : -EINVAL; } - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); out_unlocked: return err; @@ -1539,7 +1540,7 @@ loop_get_status_compat(struct loop_devic int err; if (!arg) { - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return -EINVAL; } err = loop_get_status(lo, &info64); @@ -1556,16 +1557,16 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_ switch(cmd) { case LOOP_SET_STATUS: - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); err = loop_set_status_compat( lo, (const struct compat_loop_info __user *) arg); - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); break; case LOOP_GET_STATUS: - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); err = loop_get_status_compat( lo, (struct compat_loop_info __user *) arg); - /* loop_get_status() unlocks lo_ctl_mutex */ + /* loop_get_status() unlocks loop_ctl_mutex */ break; case LOOP_SET_CAPACITY: case LOOP_CLR_FD: @@ -1609,7 +1610,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt)) return; - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) { /* * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread @@ -1627,7 +1628,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue); } - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); } static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) @@ -1673,10 +1674,10 @@ static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id struct loop_device *lo = ptr; struct loop_func_table *xfer = data; - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer) loop_release_xfer(lo); - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return 0; } @@ -1849,7 +1850,6 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device * if (!part_shift) disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN; disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_EXT_DEVT; - mutex_init(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0); lo->lo_number = i; spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock); @@ -1962,19 +1962,19 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm); if (ret < 0) break; - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) { ret = -EBUSY; - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); break; } if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) { ret = -EBUSY; - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); break; } lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number); loop_remove(lo); break; --- a/drivers/block/loop.h +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct loop_device { spinlock_t lo_lock; int lo_state; - struct mutex lo_ctl_mutex; struct kthread_worker worker; struct task_struct *worker_task; bool use_dio;