Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6256465imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:58:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4jiFqiNjsq45CLBpldpd4iDto3Wl3s9FCN5AiBOghwDSg2j8sr09jH1guh/MCp4k+VXDUf X-Received: by 2002:a63:e84c:: with SMTP id a12mr27923470pgk.241.1548079093908; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:58:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548079093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PwqapTjyfHw2wF3RfnRMubKAk8rsB2XnA+TXZRN4DLlYGJnzi4X8w2v5HG03Fy4i2I 3qBS5iIvhBrB+oLUTZpxx7R6B0991/3h09WJuYJRSmoq10oSx/BHztAq534Ujw3+Q94y 6KQHhWYPU8+3qne5XYparc7uAlEPufe1Gl4UKqrwtcoWuucbYtxxcpWDSbQka7cFLu9Z k5DbI7a4Ur2u0bWoOA3D4FxG7XxGFmpM/iP3qaEZ9o6mscytZfX5q497rapNeJ3oUBbp 2L+8lx5Ys766Fw7ZKhkL2ZN2roP4E0nVr4T70VTUL7HOh+dCdq4zrkgvP/F5Q19a7ttP rg+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=iCxuDofzxKDnosvG3sfkwISXzXOzH4UQ8WloVF/ERZQ=; b=KVXKnA6AVbDQFyXxKGQ57E10i15mJZP3r8bT1VWCZlIHCVZ27UuwKIwBlM+qF0bgHT KQuYdJJcNUVy8tdIqxMTjj2f2MvzAt4lgea/55MRthXlS7Cug+aN7D13JMi6slzYYikG 6idzhUmlWapenp4i2ZAdBEC4UNZVPLe2jEdZ1iK9gB/K77SaFpgARO+Or8npNDQfvB+g c78Ds7zVgOFrZxpQvERHjjE6GEFd+XoAgo9pB80larclJ9AvTL45M0j/drNUrOv+mqvl sxGcF8sxWwJywGNb4cZGqwMUB7Zp32hoUk3cIQZkXMml8x75Xiu4YMxUXYcL8rtOVepk cvGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="lOvvjy/v"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k11si12761941pgh.132.2019.01.21.05.57.58; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:58:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="lOvvjy/v"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731478AbfAUN4R (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41240 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731874AbfAUN4M (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4AB420861; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:56:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548078971; bh=GSCxyao6A1PkZadgSNRq83ybpgG4yrWWQD99x9b2mKs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lOvvjy/vLkgAKZiuIuhw56iuP6EiL3StrgOwHGiVjyx0Jr+JxPEtP5ScIUCqGsEaR xf+e+MIQKykb+g2eV1QVBpSTS9tVXGJIIMwpOZH8YXLSvkJV8PrDjppt+s4uK3MK1B Ct8FcpnNv5dIrZrqw9MZ4CjpZCtVqzEZxgVlS+KU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 4.9 48/51] loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:44:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20190121122458.478713698@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190121122453.700446926@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190121122453.700446926@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara commit 0a42e99b58a208839626465af194cfe640ef9493 upstream. Now that loop_ctl_mutex is global, just get rid of loop_index_mutex as there is no good reason to keep these two separate and it just complicates the locking. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/loop.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ #include static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex); static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex); static int max_part; @@ -1560,9 +1559,11 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_ static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode) { struct loop_device *lo; - int err = 0; + int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); + if (err) + return err; lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; if (!lo) { err = -ENXIO; @@ -1571,7 +1572,7 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device * atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt); out: - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return err; } @@ -1580,12 +1581,11 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d struct loop_device *lo; int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); lo = disk->private_data; if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt)) - goto unlock_index; + goto out_unlock; - mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) { /* * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d */ err = loop_clr_fd(lo); if (!err) - goto unlock_index; + return; } else { /* * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config, @@ -1602,9 +1602,8 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d loop_flush(lo); } +out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); -unlock_index: - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); } static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = { @@ -1890,7 +1889,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t struct kobject *kobj; int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); err = loop_lookup(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift); if (err < 0) err = loop_add(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift); @@ -1898,7 +1897,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t kobj = NULL; else kobj = get_disk(lo->lo_disk); - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); *part = 0; return kobj; @@ -1908,9 +1907,13 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi unsigned long parm) { struct loop_device *lo; - int ret = -ENOSYS; + int ret; + + ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); + if (ret) + return ret; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + ret = -ENOSYS; switch (cmd) { case LOOP_CTL_ADD: ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm); @@ -1924,7 +1927,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm); if (ret < 0) break; - mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) { ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); @@ -1936,7 +1938,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi break; } lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number); loop_remove(lo); break; @@ -1946,7 +1947,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi break; ret = loop_add(&lo, -1); } - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return ret; } @@ -2029,10 +2030,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void) THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL); /* pre-create number of devices given by config or max_loop */ - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) loop_add(&lo, i); - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n"); return 0;