Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6257415imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:59:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6btpTnKsgMxlIUWgxpHsoZMjsFUMv4SOByKMBAWlqaJ6E3x+V1rAufg29R+IHp2dk5TfI6 X-Received: by 2002:a62:64d7:: with SMTP id y206mr29890888pfb.84.1548079164915; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:59:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548079164; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ihqvh+W0IPHQDlF2hF7j8lDXJZ+9S3dcnAZSiuIOtuv9R5y8aWT1ar0icm4RGyNLjU COywGi8RTTQW4Ei2T915VXhzHhM8B3/YETTwcR9RNQJAtUV2OvBMNtH2wR12EedC/HB9 VjzRqF4TETuYOxR1F7/h4u2dQswxyHWeO7n/pvjU0S0RHvD5NwYv6hfeYE+J4GoEUDkz 0IipQSDkkmK0k8iPeLHk5ICaX6NtIx6g/2Rz6hU4iOuNIG8eCIZqiu3E3eT79hsK8Qfi X0T2AoRUcZ8ZcStOupTkKI1RwftwWs0IVdVEuKJx7a0bqZi31GRXtcOo0+4u7vrUqm+R cMAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=VF/XJij4qz7+TGiTooGhapwf42MtENliBs1XluE4BGw=; b=OWcLTvWEPW2Lr7mTS/7Z9zrn2dc2HzPouR4nuoWjzZ1BW9MS3o+2MtRYVY/kQTPjVk QIoBVOf62sKz83nfkeM1H1QxXvqONzUJ9dJbRbYsjjt7icudOepryjJbg6v0YPMLguEJ qbyHDx2Zj1NJsEV9Je0DZxNCTmtEzoW4kvixaUEOViXSn/1GlOn/pFjha1av+tLvDCPU +UjPhFN1mtgLTJ9bBVj193B35w1OuTUWVgpobkn8ZXYwtuyhGC0UnePAzcYDoN+CK51Q uDJyUERRSBu+mXrBPCMZtqyhv/IgaiJH7qZAIksXBpxhfGuzMLI0YR3tdvK1qjiGKeiC huoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=J1tinOwg; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j26si12074875pgl.537.2019.01.21.05.59.09; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=J1tinOwg; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731886AbfAUN4P (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:15 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41178 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731406AbfAUN4J (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33F2120861; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548078968; bh=PEZbxAxF70wLDRRdbL8eSeb1Js66nOX6kMR6/lqPAWs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J1tinOwgmrd4JMJBqorne7c9y3VpMt8s7MnfsE/7rwYd6f1+q/4bD4D8l6DNez9T1 qX9rg6WHYcjuGs1Yb4N1LjBn9YujJDv0d2qqftuZkX2hlrqOEzZO4H7TbRKCVE0Gio BGQraiFDc+404IdCkdjSUE0Ngn04xwOVqPyJV1wg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 4.9 47/51] loop: Fold __loop_release into loop_release Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:44:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20190121122458.410898273@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190121122453.700446926@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190121122453.700446926@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara commit 967d1dc144b50ad005e5eecdfadfbcfb399ffff6 upstream. __loop_release() has a single call site. Fold it there. This is currently not a huge win but it will make following replacement of loop_index_mutex more obvious. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/loop.c | 16 +++++++--------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -1575,12 +1575,15 @@ out: return err; } -static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo) +static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) { + struct loop_device *lo; int err; + mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + lo = disk->private_data; if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt)) - return; + goto unlock_index; mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) { @@ -1590,7 +1593,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev */ err = loop_clr_fd(lo); if (!err) - return; + goto unlock_index; } else { /* * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config, @@ -1600,12 +1603,7 @@ static void __lo_release(struct loop_dev } mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); -} - -static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode) -{ - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); - __lo_release(disk->private_data); +unlock_index: mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); }