Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot <syzbot+c0138741c2290fc5e63f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 96/99] loop: Fix double mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) in loop_control_ioctl()
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:49:28 +0100
Message-Id: <20190121134919.830966841@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190121134913.924726465@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190121134913.924726465@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

commit 628bd85947091830a8c4872adfd5ed1d515a9cf2 upstream.

Commit 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex") forgot to
remove mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) from loop_control_ioctl() when
replacing loop_index_mutex with loop_ctl_mutex.

Fixes: 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+c0138741c2290fc5e63f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/block/loop.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -2075,12 +2075,10 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi
 			break;
 		if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
-			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 			break;
 		}
 		if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
-			mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
 			break;
 		}
 		lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL;