Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261567AbUCBFoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:44:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261568AbUCBFoa (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:44:30 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:29843 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261567AbUCBFo2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:44:28 -0500 To: "Tolentino, Matthew E" Cc: Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables References: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 01 Mar 2004 22:36:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1000 Lines: 20 "Tolentino, Matthew E" writes: > > I have rewritten and compiled tested the boot_ioremap code but I don't > > have a configuration to test it. This effects the EFI code and the > > numa srat code. It might be worth replacing boot_ioremap with __va() > > to reduce the amount of error checking necessary. > > I just blindly applied this patch and tried it on an x86 EFI system > with no luck. It's not mapping correctly for some reason. I'll look > at the problem closer in a bit. Thanks I'd appreciate it. There is the earlyprintk fix patch I posted earlier that might help. You say it is not mapping correctly? What do you mean? Is it a bug in boot_ioremap or something else. Or do you know yet? Thanks, Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/