Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190121183723.25231-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20190121191816.GH12679@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20190121191816.GH12679@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:55:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDK92yZZFzkoZriCSObm+jf1=RQ99K4uAGSCKSnTXhURA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] pwm-regulator: reduce noise on EPROBE_DEFER
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:18 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > pwm-regulator can be a bit noisy during boot.
> >
> > One example are the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs when using
> > multi_v7_defconfig (which has CONFIG_REGULATOR_PWM=y and
>
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost.
noted - sorry for the noise.

the patch description already contains all relevant information, so I
won't re-send the patch.
only the KernelCI link is not included because I'm not sure how long
it's valid (instead the description includes all relevant information
which also can be seen in the KernelCI link)


Regards
Martin