Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf scripts python: Add Python 3 support to
 mem-phys-addr.py
To:     seeteena <s1seetee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com
References: <1547655825-28754-1-git-send-email-s1seetee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1547655825-28754-8-git-send-email-s1seetee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20190116093233.4873b784@lwn.net>
 <89d6529f-1849-ce36-bd33-b65f2252214c@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From:   Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=tonyj@suse.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQGiBEkQmbwRBACDch7wo/RzlNt2HA8jLICsO2w8yOkJ7UTzHYNn3Q83Ro0qev2KokfE3EDw
 il+vam9CDR7jIDmswHqaMe0/O+UnZtO5PlDgylZcrwNwbBzHfm/KGejbi1RBGAoETrvcfwGi
 w83bR/aDnoRXY5Ho1uphQ05/065EMpbJOOBdn9qQ4wCgv2Q6C/QeYDGsxJPRO+20nLu5K00D
 /Rde4OTZ5biM+vb6ObTmgPNeiMrTwGpMokN7audIl7njwvD+lYrlgQjmDzcaPFz29rYWwT7g
 6t6hcFgjpU1he/v3qxeQlTJoi2+u5Mqj42z//49h6DqNjT859Z/6h5IwKBo/EZC17iBIlS2G
 VXAstNiZASGiaIlONozWJ/GSjUaRA/9wZTV1nXF/+xX+qmc7SvTg1w6jWyjxVumQLoq2SeA4
 1Sy5X2IATkAGCCjbeoQGnFdbOnHRSJdlTazObgwreqGPlPnIROpr9QESkfxsaCkDiZfpl0xk
 6X069QMZBEwGAWILHYXL9UqlOjniZaU2BkVA11JEdBhyQorC8T/ji1edc7QaVG9ueSBKb25l
 cyA8dG9ueWpAc3VzZS5kZT6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSRCZvAIbAwYLCQgHAwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4B
 AheAAAoJELFYWyEf4koXGmYAoKCnbv9dhAB2vR6IvSJem1ws4HpfAJ9ZqTKiXcogBGfTPaJR
 GI9QhVUieLkCDQRJEJm8EAgAzr9Zd3v7B10ODtVc7XxbMe3W6o1FdClL9ZIgLv61zhWctafK
 DMu/MUSvxmYFq00pecD/SfX8oxArA02+sQ2E+/Zb4J7NAWIAxCfmy7VE0wDBrZH/hBapIx/L
 gVqYfZ9Rw+a4FXrlk1y8oQCwhvj+kWrm7V7olR0aPOy1NFGNUyTFSMj+pbmxiNOXdCxVUQe3
 UE1k9yA+mILjyaRanwkiCLCjNvRPL88Q017BdhVBWZmz8qhwXN/RrjCcDHsPX5O0ev68MLyu
 sh5mfukuvCqzW1Y3Ql+iwfwEw5lNmQGdoV9csg7JP7saDicSFO2KcZvMbvDMqtPFipdF5UWo
 fZKZ3wADBQf/b5cVNyb5i8QI0G7BPGBNn4VlQX5n66TsPBnrRNOi3MhTTVEBCp8s+jqUjJjX
 EjjA+O4hIm7Qqdsozurw7GlcQ0A06dIzO/1RUglZZMoC0JL43ZQmJ+3+yFrLjWgGH6ev6AOb
 YLH7ZujgAB5n0Hy2ZIChzsKLKbHptFtBvpDKB8updq+GunsY4oN3wGa67h9sHqDvjyp64Czg
 n8G5uGLwx3f/edbECKz5kPUSzChEk3suK742SEP01v4ra5WX88Hn81NjGByQMz9acJLdC7Ff
 LzXvbNa0KgvDaSllYfsJIoGCz3eKVOuTWXOiaEIKuy833+3mr2PulLCyLKysAEddKohJBBgR
 AgAJBQJJEJm8AhsMAAoJELFYWyEf4koXhgQAn1EGATLZPS53At9t+p3S8BkNI9yRAJ9A0OmL
 liv+rwEesYGlGeGNaKHTJw==
Message-ID: <ffb27358-cf7e-20f3-0468-f4cdb1088a7c@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:45:52 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <89d6529f-1849-ce36-bd33-b65f2252214c@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/17/19 1:48 AM, seeteena wrote:
> I have added

>> You have not added "from __future__ import print_function", so you're
>> relying on a Python 2 parsing oddity to make this work. 

I didn't see Jon's comment earlier.  Sorry to have given conflicting advice.  I'd not considered it a parsing oddity but I think he's correct.

There is a flip side however and that is that this oddity probably works in versions older than v2.6 which is as far back as future support exists.

I can't imagine anyone is using < 2.6 but I have no idea what PYTHON=python2 actually implies.  The other option is to switch to sys.write.stdout
which has always had more consistent semantics. 

Tony