Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7038714imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:28:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN70F1aOSLxXCDNrqJPnU/1eQO1UB+nKzebOuqL552ymHAne8YGUSsPHskYG2Y7Dt/EGIRlk X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:5a86:: with SMTP id r6mr31880371pli.301.1548138511813; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:28:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548138511; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=atZ6VxAGnfhS++jCXoVFIHbdUilZHvUG8nhAH7C6bexC7hSPSr08Ejo7c1YMlxllo6 7C6nIFoffiHC0uZfTSvsdg95+CG/DMeKGY18RAmdhhx1JjrOabmbBu05yvz5lA3O1Xjk aZiFmdoYKUEd8OrtNs8XuvtsIO5lN8IPoW4V9sPzjYFn8/q3ilvsqYWnrmHh5AA8S9vH BQX2QERFutD66hbOaaZr58AsddQ/Zfj9jqX7FLtZ5t5VNxEn6n+yWgBI8+Nl1KtaVmhV JMwkxRxROlucS2rrSpxACWKWsDbJPHAkwuh8zqAmwEDWNQLMzXi7HghNfBk1ds+MxTu3 ZYaw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=e8jXkpB/T+CjRVM7qysk0BQ16HfDyopHE4oMPrDIJAs=; b=x//7VpPROb/jO0a6LNahO+XvPfFFKOiOwkH6FJDsxVVfvHH8uU960uax+hcTbvpIML Zo2w+iQ1AIVOQflmtxWJyz+eE9lBr+8JFaqeBLI3WGLxXiY/cs9qF5jWDJOalDfB1Di7 59XzpWm1Bpdtc9ZQq5rlD2R17oTx1NJ/ALEe57zsTNlqWZFYqPhCLJ87h8pOvNqwdwSe 4AL/RKeTMkvS4s3agizc2Nw/xs6bDT2004rGFcyDsyWjC/45A1LCW9qLAwzq2Lhwe5bH 1QOeeCP8fPRjIbEY9pSqZ35zLei067GL8jPzho90UVCI5piSdEojhgPMJJKGIJRTe2Z+ lRVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=CNmKYxod; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d37si15127152plb.140.2019.01.21.22.28.16; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:28:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=CNmKYxod; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726423AbfAVG02 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:26:28 -0500 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:55692 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726029AbfAVG01 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:26:27 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0M6Q3XN029465; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:26:03 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1548138363; bh=e8jXkpB/T+CjRVM7qysk0BQ16HfDyopHE4oMPrDIJAs=; h=Subject:From:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CNmKYxodv/4fuI7weHVuc4vzMKpJfBqfPF3rdyZ0p2vxI2DvHKeNwEe9XXq5riL3Q 54xfsVRJBU8NxNuI0pe8Y+My3QAWHVnWDSMSfoRB/41kn1M4f9Vi4N9/g4Vdcw/08k 84z4RmC98JuVN1ctTDktmVx+kp0kR8NEDLd394aw= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0M6Q2lO099069 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:26:02 -0600 Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:26:02 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:26:02 -0600 Received: from [172.24.191.45] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0M6Pwut027309; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:25:59 -0600 Subject: Re: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH v3 3/3] arm: omap_hwmod disable ick autoidling when a hwmod requires that From: Keerthy To: Andreas Kemnade CC: Tony Lindgren , Discussions about the Letux Kernel , , , , , , , , References: <20190116220429.9136-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190116220429.9136-4-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190118154807.GV5544@atomide.com> <20190118181827.7163bee4@aktux> <20190118183630.GX5544@atomide.com> <20190118203832.3be7975e@aktux> <20190118204204.44db353f@aktux> <20190118194802.GZ5544@atomide.com> <20190119081211.73844b6a@aktux> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:56:01 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/01/19 1:28 PM, J, KEERTHY wrote: > > > On 1/19/2019 12:42 PM, Andreas Kemnade wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:09:48 +0530 >> "J, KEERTHY" wrote: >> >>> On 1/19/2019 1:18 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>> * Andreas Kemnade [190118 19:42]: >>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:38:47 +0100 >>>>> Andreas Kemnade wrote: >>>>> ? >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:36:30 -0800 >>>>>> Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> til the next workaround. >>>>>>> ????? >>>>>>>> That flags also causes the iclk being enabled/disabled >>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes but SWSUP_IDLE for the interface clock to me currently >>>>>>> just means: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock" >>>>>>> ????? >>>>>> well, if we want to manually disable it and not automatically, >>>>>> we have to disable autoidle or it will be automatically disabled. >>>>>> >>>>>> Disabling it manually when it is already auto-disabled (by >>>>>> autoidle) is >>>>>> just practically a no-op towards the clock. >>>>>> ? >>>>>>> and with your changes it becomes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock and block >>>>>>> ?? autoidle while in use". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So aren't we now changing the way things behave in general >>>>>>> for SWSUP_IDLE? >>>>>>> ????? >>>>>> Yes, we are, so proper testing is needed. But If I read those >>>>>> comments >>>>>> it was always intended this way but not fully implemented because it >>>>>> appeared to be more work like needing a usecounter (which my patchset >>>>>> also adds) for that autoidle flag. >>>>>> ? >>>>> and there are quite few hwmods marked by this flag. >>>>> And then there are those clocks marked by this flags (on am33xx) which >>>>> do not have that autoidle feature at all, so the risk is not too high. >>>> >>>> Keerthy, can you please test this series on top of the >>>> related clock patches with your am335x PM test cases? >>> >>> Can you point me to the clock series that needs to be tested >>> along with this? >>> >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/?series=66691 > > Thanks Andreas. I will test both series and get back. Tested for DS0 (deeps sleep 0 on am33/am43 boards) No issues seen with the current patch series on top of clock series. Tested-by: Keerthy > >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >>