Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261700AbUCBRHu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261707AbUCBRHu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:50 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:35038 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261700AbUCBRHt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:07:49 -0500 Message-Id: <200403021707.i22H7ZE21826@mail.osdl.org> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:07:25 -0800 (PST) From: markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: AS performance with reiser4 on 2.6.3 To: Nikita@Namesys.COM cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, reiserfs-list@Namesys.COM, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <16447.35731.535168.298454@laputa.namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 27 On 27 Feb, Nikita Danilov wrote: > The rest is not that clear. Probably you workload results in highly > fragmented file(s). This is consistent with high CPU consumption by > lookup_extent (http://khack.osdl.org/stp/288741/profile/profile-tick.sort). > > If test doesn't delete its working files before exiting, can you execute > > measurefs.reiser4 -T /device-with-reiser4 > measurefs.reiser4 -D /device-with-reiser4 > > and, if number of files on the file system is sane > > measurefs.reiser4 -D -E /device-with-reiser4 Sorry this took a couple of days, but you can view the output of those commands towards the end of the log file here: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/289045/logs/run-log.txt You should be able to find the output by searching for the 'measurefs' commands. Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/