Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261707AbUCBRLk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:11:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261712AbUCBRLk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:11:40 -0500 Received: from sb0-cf9a48a7.dsl.impulse.net ([207.154.72.167]:20878 "EHLO madrabbit.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261707AbUCBRLj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:11:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3 From: Ray Lee To: pnelson@andrew.cmu.edu Cc: Linux Kernel Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078247497.1157.1886.camel@orca.madrabbit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 09:11:38 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 22 Hey there, > Based on these results I personally am now going with XFS as it's > faster than ReiserFS in the real-world benchmarks and my current > Ext3 partition's performance is getting worse and worse. If your current Ext3 partition was created under 2.4.x, you may wish to recreate it under 2.6. 2.6 uses a different algorithm to lay out directory blocks (google on 'orlov allocator') and this can affect performance. ~ ~ Nicely done, btw. Ray - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/