Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: kmemleak panic
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@nvidia.com>,
        Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <f6fbf528-8213-e3b8-6990-9fcf9dec04d6@free.fr>
 <20190118143434.GE118707@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
 <b7629ecf-757c-f8b5-df83-ba83d7036b2f@free.fr>
 <20190119132832.GA29881@MBP.local>
 <6579db26-10ac-3fbf-1998-5b937a38f202@free.fr>
 <d4facdc2-0581-929f-caa2-b9efa9bd8f97@arm.com>
 <CAL_JsqKFT8J6g02gxeBiTfBb_XHhp2-ZNB6DgaLPK85kNZGRig@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190121143704.GE29504@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
 <CAL_JsqKQb34zVNTzo9DLNiDwmWGxkrKezSOjwCUPAvgzUoLYjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190121174234.GC26461@rapoport-lnx>
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
Message-ID: <2bb30550-435a-046c-4f45-21dd594aa695@free.fr>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:02:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190121174234.GC26461@rapoport-lnx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 21/01/2019 18:42, Mike Rapoport wrote:

> If I understood correctly, the trouble comes from no-map range allocated in 
> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch().
> 
> There's indeed imbalance, because memblock_alloc() does kmemleak_alloc(), but
> memblock_remove() does not do kmemleak_free().
> 
> I think the best way is to replace __memblock_alloc_base() with
> memblock_find_in_range(), e.g something like:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 1977ee0adcb1..6807a1cffe55 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -37,21 +37,16 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
>  	 */
>  	end = !end ? MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE : end;
>  	align = !align ? SMP_CACHE_BYTES : align;
> -	base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end);
> +	base = memblock_find_in_range(size, align, start, end);
>  	if (!base)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Check if the allocated region fits in to start..end window
> -	 */
> -	if (base < start) {
> -		memblock_free(base, size);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> -
>  	*res_base = base;
>  	if (nomap)
>  		return memblock_remove(base, size);
> +	else
> +		return memblock_reserve(base, size);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Your patch solves the issue. \o/