Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7446915imu; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 06:15:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4uETpd2EiYZ3XrMjMfk6n+g2ByDBx5ZcAhF7D0LAK+9w2erhDjWyw54HYGHH9MD8789ViF X-Received: by 2002:a63:f141:: with SMTP id o1mr32673217pgk.134.1548166540193; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 06:15:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548166540; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y7Lrg53kvjclm1pjx+OzIbO+yx9Bsnb14dk2WXtUePaK2ov8JlgKcSEc5/fYfP950u 6MfdLJkWarBCStbdQI5iul8KWGtx5+49emoI4PR47l1UbrSZ0VuxKGe0h5izgOpSD8z4 4lAxp9yN7C/3lVOt6qR0/810Ucm8upmeJxHJde/WevHx2jRa0KE09rwCgLknfXjAX6cp XOFOjCh9kcl4miqLa463yXRGatMdjw3eXpDXjmiL8kroCDPmgrPUJhJSTcqsHC24GFOF Ssf1ya9bS0rbTyEnWfHzMaGm3NvKHlgqi2eZs3VJKhDzOiX+be2pS2F6DWqBMr2B7JfH s6Dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=FKhNrDu1psBLAlqefJ04611u0uGW0qaDpe4BsbZZ8QU=; b=PYl3IywDBNxBgNA1Pfs5Urf4sqwBaekYXI5AtM8odZ0iFpUY/BKeoOeKlDMmBDS1O8 iqbNp0RAecHjWKnmvmRRgs9+5av+FIc3TopP+cLyUE9PrcWwheRL3jwU4/lO8jf5CW+p uPqWkrWMN06AZEYnta+chf5aTQBmUeUujucpgofSF/aqtWkZOvQqYy68wTsMH8VKN2pH b53aVRupQn6DwD+TvkeZRUtPzs4mgPoxb+FTTq3wOi9IMGPbqycs0+4SdEOdxbWhBEdj n+6B/UsPXKYYURuQJjJ1tqChA0/gII3jfWtvE1UYHak4uTsyXGsnWUSCRsVmbcjnHL9/ h9xg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a4si15097040pls.262.2019.01.22.06.15.23; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 06:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728677AbfAVONm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:13:42 -0500 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.3]:45936 "EHLO smtp3-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728416AbfAVONm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:13:42 -0500 Received: from [192.168.108.68] (unknown [213.36.7.13]) (Authenticated sender: marc.w.gonzalez) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB16813F8A9; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:12:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: kmemleak panic From: Marc Gonzalez To: Mike Rapoport , Rob Herring , Catalin Marinas , Prateek Patel , Sachin Nikam , John Hubbard , Ralph Campbell Cc: Robin Murphy , Frank Rowand , Marek Szyprowski , Bjorn Andersson , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Oscar Salvador , Wei Yang , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Qian Cai , LKML References: <20190118143434.GE118707@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <20190119132832.GA29881@MBP.local> <6579db26-10ac-3fbf-1998-5b937a38f202@free.fr> <20190121143704.GE29504@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <20190121174234.GC26461@rapoport-lnx> <2bb30550-435a-046c-4f45-21dd594aa695@free.fr> Message-ID: <3c886941-bf9d-f040-b568-ee7a8eba9a04@free.fr> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:12:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bb30550-435a-046c-4f45-21dd594aa695@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/01/2019 15:02, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > On 21/01/2019 18:42, Mike Rapoport wrote: > >> If I understood correctly, the trouble comes from no-map range allocated in >> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(). >> >> There's indeed imbalance, because memblock_alloc() does kmemleak_alloc(), but >> memblock_remove() does not do kmemleak_free(). >> >> I think the best way is to replace __memblock_alloc_base() with >> memblock_find_in_range(), e.g something like: >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c >> index 1977ee0adcb1..6807a1cffe55 100644 >> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c >> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c >> @@ -37,21 +37,16 @@ int __init __weak early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size, >> */ >> end = !end ? MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE : end; >> align = !align ? SMP_CACHE_BYTES : align; >> - base = __memblock_alloc_base(size, align, end); >> + base = memblock_find_in_range(size, align, start, end); >> if (!base) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> - /* >> - * Check if the allocated region fits in to start..end window >> - */ >> - if (base < start) { >> - memblock_free(base, size); >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - } >> - >> *res_base = base; >> if (nomap) >> return memblock_remove(base, size); >> + else >> + return memblock_reserve(base, size); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> > > Your patch solves the issue. \o/ [ Add nvidia devs, but drop schowdary@nvidia.com ]