Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:00:49 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Cc:     andy.gross@linaro.org, olof@lixom.net, arnd@arndb.de,
        rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
        khilman@baylibre.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        skannan@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        amit.kucheria@linaro.org, seansw@qti.qualcomm.com,
        daidavid1@codeaurora.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
        dianders@chromium.org, abailon@baylibre.com,
        maxime.ripard@bootlin.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com,
        henryc.chen@mediatek.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] Introduce on-chip interconnect API
Message-ID: <20190122150048.GA11466@kroah.com>
References: <20190116161103.6937-1-georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
 <20190122124204.GA26969@kroah.com>
 <2ac9b994-ecbf-05fd-5c01-7ecd0089c744@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2ac9b994-ecbf-05fd-5c01-7ecd0089c744@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> On 1/22/19 14:42, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> [..]
> > 
> > All now queued up, thanks.
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Thanks for considering these patches! Actually i have a branch named
> icc-next [1] which is pulled into linux-next. I will drop these same
> patches to avoid conflicts.
> 
> If all is well, i was wondering how to proceed with follow-up patches.
> Some consumers of this API are already floating on the lists. How about
> sending you a pull request before the merge window with the collected
> patches?

Sure, that works, or you can just send them as patches, either works for
me.

greg k-h