Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp7543873imu; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:40:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5JrfFThbHK2oWzmfHXlRQhgJrnYLdnpYv/Cfl4cJKHId14KOuYgHuAD02Ly8Qfbf5XYegf X-Received: by 2002:a62:fc8a:: with SMTP id e132mr33477472pfh.176.1548171621174; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:40:21 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548171621; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=d3nMl8fn18InT4hAU9l419HoCDkLiwneFFu7B/WV7lbtRv6s27rZouQcGTQV+JelLc ttnA9wsSffiaXxtDQKlO0T1GsCAiujfW7zI/1qf6dZyrXkba5B526NpHLBJ2Y3EW8o+B fErLjQcG1rotJJe/qa08YwaSaKrGNj9Bp4gG1V8FU95kiu5Ae3EWF+cCRdoLC4QTuHkP IKp9KypfL4biDtFnTNKG7ioUfyWzm6jVRisw+ncq7+3o/z7Rqw8P4x6qaPy5THqP2vk9 wCQcO0fKgZxC/o5xFI5o/Pqitaa10rndHEyqSqoYXe7KVrQp1gWfAasTbpF7Wc5EGvNM CAvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=mEPANTAI/Rl+2H2/ahTjtkfCCb7JaTSACTbkqmeai9Y=; b=njlhw+pU5mDv02EywZqyB9YYJNHWHJBWBmlHw4QjI023kuZHc9VjfbwllTi3/k+yxg OcS4jDDUCEUsOXPSjtB+8XzyZXTp55L/cmSPFM/3z1LB49eDNr3y/n0ssxmrq16N2+ji g6OgvAnd4QKTEKQMbZbtHiOwRhDwc54w9webxgLdvXThr0CFeJzHbX77BjTQHrd4Atfy z+M6JfhU4ZYvGN/RBKG0NmqA4EqUhE+7JjkXBFIUXv1xq2caswFTG6Hzs1l3Qh7ZSEZM DVSj5RVDFrtiYqg/atJiKOkpkVaOnA1ax36cQDu0k63CpLfLVffMTGHpIwkxLxCaaL3v Yt3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 203si11567089pgb.440.2019.01.22.07.40.01; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:40:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728933AbfAVPiB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:38:01 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:46648 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728633AbfAVPiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:38:01 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x0MFVXMJ004720 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:38:00 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q658qabpq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:37:59 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:57 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:52 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0MFbp1g6160754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:51 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEE54C040; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04664C04A; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.91.23]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:37:48 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] kexec, KEYS: Make use of platform keyring for signature verify From: Mimi Zohar To: Kairui Song , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, dyoung@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:37:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190121095929.26915-3-kasong@redhat.com> References: <20190121095929.26915-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190121095929.26915-3-kasong@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19012215-0028-0000-0000-0000033C9566 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19012215-0029-0000-0000-000023F9CFB8 Message-Id: <1548171458.4038.3.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-22_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901220121 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 17:59 +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > This patch let kexec_file_load makes use of .platform keyring as fall > back if it failed to verify a PE signed image against secondary or > builtin key ring, make it possible to verify kernel image signed with > preboot keys as well. > > This commit adds a VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING similar to previous > VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING indicating that verify_pkcs7_signature > should verify the signature using platform keyring. Also, decrease > the error message log level when verification failed with -ENOKEY, > so that if called tried multiple time with different keyring it > won't generate extra noises. > > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song Reviewed/Tested-by: Mimi Zohar > --- > arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > certs/system_keyring.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > include/linux/verification.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c > index 7d97e432cbbc..2c007abd3d40 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c > @@ -534,9 +534,16 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data) > #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG > static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len) > { > - return verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len, > - VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING, > - VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE); > + int ret; > + ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len, > + VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING, > + VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE); > + if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) { > + ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len, > + VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING, > + VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE); > + } > + return ret; > } > #endif > > diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c > index 4690ef9cda8a..7085c286f4bd 100644 > --- a/certs/system_keyring.c > +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c > @@ -240,11 +240,22 @@ int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *data, size_t len, > #else > trusted_keys = builtin_trusted_keys; > #endif > + } else if (trusted_keys == VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING) { > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING > + trusted_keys = platform_trusted_keys; > +#else > + trusted_keys = NULL; > +#endif > + if (!trusted_keys) { > + ret = -ENOKEY; > + pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform keyring is not available\n"); > + goto error; > + } > } > ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys); > if (ret < 0) { > if (ret == -ENOKEY) > - pr_err("PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key\n"); > + pr_devel("PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key\n"); > goto error; > } > > diff --git a/include/linux/verification.h b/include/linux/verification.h > index cfa4730d607a..018fb5f13d44 100644 > --- a/include/linux/verification.h > +++ b/include/linux/verification.h > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > * should be used. > */ > #define VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING ((struct key *)1UL) > +#define VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING ((struct key *)2UL) > > /* > * The use to which an asymmetric key is being put.