Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262055AbUCBWXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262074AbUCBWXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:24 -0500 Received: from gprs40-190.eurotel.cz ([160.218.40.190]:24409 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262055AbUCBWXU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:23:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:23:07 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Tom Rini Cc: "Amit S. Kale" , Kernel Mailing List , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [KGDB PATCH][1/7] Add / use kernel/Kconfig.kgdb Message-ID: <20040302222307.GB1225@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040227212301.GC1052@smtp.west.cox.net> <200403021709.26396.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <20040302150544.GC16434@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040302150544.GC16434@smtp.west.cox.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 21 Hi! > > It also makes core.patch dependent on 8250.patch > > Any ideas on fixing that? > > No, it's intentional. eth.patch also depends on 8250.patch. Perhaps that parts should be moved to core-lite? It should not be neccessary to have serial support... Or perhaps we want to decrease number of modules, and merge 8250 into core-lite, having one less patch to care about? Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/