Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp357920imu; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:44:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5H76h7wVMR0CPfEySC4k3HbAU6zIccSmQXKjnC5CGABQFX6hAwm/5JBmNTjQIxxvvEVyyu X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8045:: with SMTP id y5mr759273pfm.62.1548218673450; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:44:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548218673; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dyPQxG8VJmTcOgKkxj/+LORW83LOQXD53Upt6RdG/TJwn0Go8oPs3x633zN6yr4+Kj TnyJ0QKKIZGUtusI67gHzDsiAwSqRS4ZdBMPUQrGyuyrSgNDt7+CtAfD/YZkVPB7knce jhoS+/GpPzPpHrUald9VOrFR+/wkNFEgiGrLaei2Ha4PKNTbAXYdPuT0AWQP5y0Sws1g gHZFHJbhg0FwtF8OsDn2pXGUYy3lAMo3h8fUu6NEhLSqoek77SeISHWW0W8U7LjNeMq9 83Ttl0qoBm08Ndo2zZQNDs+gpOD4iHVqtSW7fPEGQJZ5GdKx8tMl/YAveqQIS5X9PxSn wS3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=oZYudSohoDVRSw2JIVLVb+V3nC/xevJeCpGI+7gPftY=; b=xeQy4Lsg4g+zlFH2zEcVCrWOJHzMvTmKHaZQphTjhHZJGBp7X0yc3rmrRofc4YU3Wy 1pXFLDXsiEWB/2mv1IWuQ9kMOTevikBdQ93nfTv4u/OiVErQnGMv1TwvbQR+3B3g2PLb dqb3KqonFAm8DwsDEfWv2ZJXEffTzEucxsrANY/2O2ONXjVpFuj8eQRxQ+kiKyx3P2mg AjfMbdQm1716BhrHeBH/1d5jBnJQb9zakqy+AWWGQIcRcbCC3E+Sa5NVpj6/xvxqPCN2 5Atlxdz9xrq3uf0wyhasHjsM3VxTzmA1TkA3+AAkdmfyaHggZdGzWwn2UOmxC5WruV1w 1bHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v2si17114170plz.53.2019.01.22.20.44.17; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726307AbfAWEnK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:43:10 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:40576 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725899AbfAWEnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:43:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::bf5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41C0014D7330F; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20190122.204308.162543596275068081.davem@davemloft.net> To: lkundrak@v3.sk Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thaller@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6: lower the level of "link is not ready" messages From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20190121135419.615989-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> References: <20190121135419.615989-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:43:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lubomir Rintel Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:54:20 +0100 > This message gets logged far too often for how interesting is it. > > Most distributions nowadays configure NetworkManager to use randomly > generated MAC addresses for Wi-Fi network scans. The interfaces end up > being periodically brought down for the address change. When they're > subsequently brought back up, the message is logged, eventually flooding > the log. > > Perhaps the message is not all that helpful: it seems to be more > interesting to hear when the addrconf actually start, not when it does > not. Let's lower its level. > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel This has always bugged me too. Applied, thanks!