Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:23:29 +0100
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc:     Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] 9p: mark expected switch fall-through
Message-ID: <20190123072329.GA27574@nautica>
References: <20190123071632.GA8039@embeddedor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190123071632.GA8039@embeddedor>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote on Wed, Jan 23, 2019:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> This patch fixes the following warning:
> 
> net/9p/trans_xen.c:514:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> 
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> 
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

Sure, taking this to my queue for -next

-- 
Dominique