Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Zhang, Lei" <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>
To:     'Mark Rutland' <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "'james.morse@arm.com'" <james.morse@arm.com>
CC:     "'catalin.marinas@arm.com'" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "'will.deacon@arm.com'" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Zhang, Lei" <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64 memory accesses may cause undefined fault on
 Fujitsu-A64FX
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] arm64 memory accesses may cause undefined fault on
 Fujitsu-A64FX
Thread-Index: AdSvK6W0/Nm6810RQFa/OOuw1JbhXP//gw+A//n57fCADGG/gP/+BGiA
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:51:08 +0000
Message-ID: <8898674D84E3B24BA3A2D289B872026A6A2A3BED@G01JPEXMBKW03>
References: <8898674D84E3B24BA3A2D289B872026A6A29FA8F@G01JPEXMBKW03>
 <20190118141758.GC12256@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
 <8898674D84E3B24BA3A2D289B872026A6A2A2F44@G01JPEXMBKW03>
 <20190122152339.GD52887@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190122152339.GD52887@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Mark, James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutland@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:24 AM
> To: Zhang, Lei/張 雷
> Cc: 'catalin.marinas@arm.com'; 'will.deacon@arm.com';
> 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org';
> 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64 memory accesses may cause undefined fault on
> Fujitsu-A64FX
> 
 
> As above, I'm very concerned that this could be taken from kernel
> context. There are a number of cases where we cannot handle such faults:
At first thanks for your comments. 
I thinks James's comments is quite similar with above comment.
I am reviewing this point now.
I will respond to your questions after I check this.

Thanks
Lei Zhang