Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:26:38 +0200
From:   Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
To:     liaoweixiong <liaoweixiong@allwinnertech.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 0/5] pstore/block: new support logger for block devices
Message-ID: <20190123182638.GD2792@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
References: <1548245116-6360-1-git-send-email-liaoweixiong@allwinnertech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1548245116-6360-1-git-send-email-liaoweixiong@allwinnertech.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:05:11PM +0800, liaoweixiong wrote:
> Why should we need pstore_block?
> 1. Most embedded intelligent equipment have no persistent ram, which
> increases costs. We perfer to cheaper solutions, like block devices.
> In fast, there is already a sample for block device logger in driver
> MTD (drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c).

I think you should add a patch for some actual block device using this
new framework to show that it can work. What HW you think would be
using things?

A.