Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1091124imu; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5iaXEmrFw3pDiKDE/dVBfwHdpW5bibUp4OULVR0OrBOo+YyCh3c51ziWRGI/sSFVTSYJL+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:780a:: with SMTP id p10mr3430985pll.54.1548268484243; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548268484; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Pt+yBCMNs7iCE7hk7aumiYQuSIY0MND7Vi2JU0tYK5pHP0s91ZpZch2bHAYlsYWB94 SWYjX1sSxF+f16MQ/sB8PUAULqni79bFr579Ezhyhee3nQyC+UfzoyX5V2Dvq/gyy9JX +XCmxeIXZ7DVObMHn1hl1xlJvluexMnqSmS2JiF8NOyTuB4iTotuB35Xd4xI6+au6O4y cgYqjBrY9bGBAd3yQirlvXxBaQkKDd5qBkq+8ZIxDzA83Ou6/XP2AnIU5Kpc5xHDo1QZ OBCVb3M0L8Lf1uMsMU28J21UNKUTnQ3nmVKV1Ibqa0VVREn39bpWP5B4/lnOwP/kZ1+e lrQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=DL3q+IUTyWeX3nP6URMGb0kr1tY0HYZhoeMEnZgMdlQ=; b=o+QLLbTpwNlgR/CrxcdcXg9Ryh6BfbB/DRZ1yifjGCE7Daoq3J7kH2boqTlbYKRTah FnOw2XSBkpdB6pBQ2xKOSFM7T5HhyAaVjE0TQ2AWj5dSJM853a+afGzq2x970YmAxX31 CKrwOdiPpu1obGLN7doKmzi/Lwb+IqS1ONgbu89xqhVnHinnwfZhbssT/DUviqJldS5s FX8o1nneEX7JJfIbecscrhxCNU6UpX7T680HrIcmZnmlLfSecvjVolU/43+8ep+wYJ7w xYLe6RLzV25kVxUTQAoDX5xoqj8N5ch4oKyE3057mA62TVnxkpuB9WbyG5/x/6WrOc/h AqxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=MRoxCjVD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a64si20605940pge.124.2019.01.23.10.34.28; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:34:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=MRoxCjVD; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726300AbfAWSd4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:33:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:45467 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726035AbfAWSdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:33:55 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a14so1569918plm.12 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:33:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DL3q+IUTyWeX3nP6URMGb0kr1tY0HYZhoeMEnZgMdlQ=; b=MRoxCjVDiMpMfRSuuTsMPA5eS5LdypuT1S2N03TZcMho7FQXUcqSoEaCerSl2mJSjA L3XXlEp+74C18MqYyGfU52SF5H+U6ImCqe+jaYEYH7ZVKXpJJnl7LQxStanFmrIweHS5 /tBPeNphOUP8B2254pKoPEbLeZ1GjS0WNrviFe7UHab/ioTFcn+EnOyhQi9VbkbEjOig 2IEXeZo0C2hgTWQPEovij6KTPPXLOhz6X2N6BvOl7lxVIdGJ/FoiuF9IoJCh7DHTD+T3 FmErd6EGssWOCKW9HXk7eImFEe8AHlQBc6Ct7miwYIzNkUPa4wchu/ZDQvmKYJWC6SDb DjbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DL3q+IUTyWeX3nP6URMGb0kr1tY0HYZhoeMEnZgMdlQ=; b=WoSzwDhWq0QG+ct2/WS2fYwWc+UajBBwbINWkayQGHzXCd2HG1EHBiplNMSBlP3C9W GY6agUCoX+0NN4mB/r78b21Zs+1EmFwYVrQK8amQdFcVouUDyDK0mPwuzUcjDEbFkwb8 nEhxvViWBnVrmhKuD+TMCNBq+3z3uzl7kLfI7zUe2J1bumcGPME/LTrVFQLTgipxF9sp rmGErjb82plAPOBX4dOBpMyTCO/I7IvT+kCpmZU4cr/m2ISBmoOE3QiKQDVW7oYhaFon nmZXxQx/HgF85NNuP+3Ic37rSfY9nVSWAcpxX39YsSc7z5SCPoPLQ7VRvREp9p6R1JXN cM2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfirZPXTJr5janjzOprfuS2kPFDHlxg4ZhebFn3HOTJuJxVybli ++8rdOcPOSRmceiBPf7ahySAIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4225:: with SMTP id g34mr3384728pld.152.1548268435382; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (S010614cc2056d97f.ed.shawcable.net. [174.3.196.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm28599907pgg.62.2019.01.23.10.33.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gmNLV-00048Y-OT; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:33:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:33:53 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dledford@redhat.com, jack@suse.de, ira.weiny@intel.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso , Christoph Lameter , Jan Kara , Daniel Jordan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm: make mm->pinned_vm an atomic64 counter Message-ID: <20190123183353.GA15768@ziepe.ca> References: <20190121174220.10583-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20190121174220.10583-2-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190121174220.10583-2-dave@stgolabs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:42:15AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Taking a sleeping lock to _only_ increment a variable is quite the > overkill, and pretty much all users do this. Furthermore, some drivers > (ie: infiniband and scif) that need pinned semantics can go to quite > some trouble to actually delay via workqueue (un)accounting for pinned > pages when not possible to acquire it. > > By making the counter atomic we no longer need to hold the mmap_sem > and can simply some code around it for pinned_vm users. The counter > is 64-bit such that we need not worry about overflows such as rdma > user input controlled from userspace. I see a number of MM people Reviewed-by this so are we good to take this in the RDMA tree now? Regards, Jason