Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1240075imu; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN56quJj3hSopJBxIv3hi7ZOnLQQVr6YINsxB/mbXVY0dJxcXZJhEsk29U/UVc96qJXY0vlA X-Received: by 2002:aa7:81d0:: with SMTP id c16mr3611866pfn.153.1548278006428; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548278006; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SX2uoqLIG5UNfAWbHicbXawuoELNcoyop0qZq1El6B3phkIdvqek9bzkDFyjMyTx9s QUxRciFpUK6JECKPVvV3sf9xgAN1YbmluZ8i0Rsg3S78v1e2bhH5IyQfMEvITeYEkpFy AJzxbQtS8zpIzh/x9rrD5ikqagnuI8Pdtlwx6sHzERkGBR9uTE1eo4cVYKBp2fHiPd/0 joaHrb8RtPQx3FA+TAZyuTgxyZ+eUl6wM9vOr9coRhdc8IpUc1tXm0EZfO7yV4U7v6bA 26NSMdLO8+fOo9dh0Lv96qlkz7mD5Z0s1lzkBSiEbcl992tCijnaRTZL9bc+1tfjRoyD Jahw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=IxanYgtUOPCOkbm1a5YRJ/rVtHNJStuZDvNxnCjMVDw=; b=n3ffmI2sHueIaMTjd3ik/zLZe0h/17jd0ga8ju7Ke9oDgIJ+9bIE8yT1HFqgFeEaS7 p+n0NglDDbdBTvb8Qu3j3chhV3+MYxw7Jid561GZcST9ivWDJIh3RwrqXYkD5FYtbV1D 9I2is476dZAnnLrK4jJ+aNJrsy0EFYcnw16qLboFwJ3qtn0g8QEBscG1kXU8IU9whPWv BaRMRoXtgMXE3DpvComdHM+d2KacP43D0uVJEFBscohOXNgS6u2mvYT4qrXD9Jr2q2mR fPELuUhqC+fxcTOiBe+xFlaMdA5YFhsj4InlD8zXZ6aLiPyfaeN5a/2lXV5TzI47GEKw TOTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="VC/niUSq"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q8si19302919pgc.580.2019.01.23.13.13.10; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="VC/niUSq"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726865AbfAWVNF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:13:05 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:42417 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726307AbfAWVNF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:13:05 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 64so1793225pfr.9 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IxanYgtUOPCOkbm1a5YRJ/rVtHNJStuZDvNxnCjMVDw=; b=VC/niUSqQj3Jq8Yw42YGLqD9evNZg7SSdxm34TrKdsqjcIuRAN//e31Vf7nNiYy4zC UZQqOgXoHeUnwv9jEnLjoT2FCd2ZqEnxDbnjDDly3vwKb9I38jr4XU/VN3AlUOidxVTb lvT21H0elKF5AzFqcnNADL2duX4M1sX2r0TQs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IxanYgtUOPCOkbm1a5YRJ/rVtHNJStuZDvNxnCjMVDw=; b=EuIGTbXzcLu0nk+aBFvk0qRMV1WVCevnsKyNdRZIAtquX367jQ3PfppENmj7qpFaas V3ZpLwGRwxPVNMA8A4PG2rSjCv9X5yglZ1XPmmZ+EFKJwb4nc5aK24kJqRCoDawvayFB BHyJFDPP2f3yMW5Pwe/mL7LAj9jC9yBZwIedBDrLZOnxSsA01oQGp0wuNCO7tj3K0sOZ GDgJTddSNPM4bTFpOB0QP6P+dPSA6/rtu2iKQ+DGkzx6NAf6QwEA64DZKzPM99f8bEqZ jl0rY82IS6+5KPxXxO/WIYGOMbN7mtGHiZSEGknefbH8f5dQbpEX3rwJ/TheZfA8wpap XNYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdlWq2auek45K1a0mNf/7KXiR/jHRHIWFyoG1XHDWK/bJkuZBLe H6dCm68La+G1Na0o7UI/XdplJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:938f:: with SMTP id r15mr3622958pfk.27.1548277983842; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm52774824pfs.108.2019.01.23.13.13.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:13:00 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Leo Yan Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Mike Leach , Robert Walker , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coresight ML Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] perf cs-etm: Change tuple from traceID-CPU# to traceID-metadata Message-ID: <20190123211300.GE620@xps15> References: <20190119014347.27441-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20190119014347.27441-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190119014347.27441-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 09:43:44AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > If packet processing wants to know the packet is bound with which ETM > version, it needs to access metadata to decide that based on metadata > magic number; but we cannot simply to use CPU logic ID number as index > to access metadata sequential array, especially when system have > hotplugged off CPUs, the metadata array are only allocated for online > CPUs but not offline CPUs, so the CPU logic number doesn't match with > its index in the array. > > For this reason, a reliable way for accessing metadata array is to use > traceID to find associated metadata; by accessing metadata content we > can know not only the CPU number but also for ETM version, which can be > used for sequential change for setting sample flags for exception > packets. This paragraph is not needed to understand why this patch is needed. Please remove. > > This patch is to change tuple from traceID-CPU# to traceID-metadata, > thus it can use the tuple to retrieve metadata pointer according to > traceID. > > For safe accessing metadata fields, this patch provides helper function > cs_etm__get_cpu() which is used to return CPU number according to > traceID; cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet() is the first consumer for this > helper function. > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan > --- > .../perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 8 ++-- > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--- > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h | 4 +- > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c > index 294efa76c9e3..cdd38ffd10d2 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c > @@ -305,14 +305,12 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder, > enum cs_etm_sample_type sample_type) > { > u32 et = 0; > - struct int_node *inode = NULL; > + int cpu; > > if (decoder->packet_count >= MAX_BUFFER - 1) > return OCSD_RESP_FATAL_SYS_ERR; > > - /* Search the RB tree for the cpu associated with this traceID */ > - inode = intlist__find(traceid_list, trace_chan_id); > - if (!inode) > + if (cs_etm__get_cpu(trace_chan_id, &cpu) < 0) > return OCSD_RESP_FATAL_SYS_ERR; > > et = decoder->tail; > @@ -322,7 +320,7 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder, > > decoder->packet_buffer[et].sample_type = sample_type; > decoder->packet_buffer[et].isa = CS_ETM_ISA_UNKNOWN; > - decoder->packet_buffer[et].cpu = *((int *)inode->priv); > + decoder->packet_buffer[et].cpu = cpu; > decoder->packet_buffer[et].start_addr = CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR; > decoder->packet_buffer[et].end_addr = CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR; > decoder->packet_buffer[et].instr_count = 0; > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > index 1aa29633ce77..e89989fe0a5c 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c > @@ -97,6 +97,20 @@ static u32 cs_etm__get_v7_protocol_version(u32 etmidr) > return CS_ETM_PROTO_ETMV3; > } > > +int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id, int *cpu) > +{ > + struct int_node *inode; > + u64 *metadata; > + > + inode = intlist__find(traceid_list, trace_chan_id); > + if (!inode) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + metadata = inode->priv; > + *cpu = (int)metadata[CS_ETM_CPU]; > + return 0; > +} > + > static void cs_etm__packet_dump(const char *pkt_string) > { > const char *color = PERF_COLOR_BLUE; > @@ -252,7 +266,7 @@ static void cs_etm__free(struct perf_session *session) > cs_etm__free_events(session); > session->auxtrace = NULL; > > - /* First remove all traceID/CPU# nodes for the RB tree */ > + /* First remove all traceID/metadata nodes for the RB tree */ > intlist__for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, traceid_list) > intlist__remove(traceid_list, inode); > /* Then the RB tree itself */ > @@ -1519,9 +1533,20 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, > 0xffffffff); > > /* > - * Create an RB tree for traceID-CPU# tuple. Since the conversion has > - * to be made for each packet that gets decoded, optimizing access in > - * anything other than a sequential array is worth doing. > + * Create an RB tree for traceID-metadata tuple. > + * > + * The conversion between traceID and CPU logic ID number has to > + * be made for each packet that gets decoded: firstly retrieve > + * metadata pointer from trace ID by using traceID-metadata tuple, > + * then read CPU logic ID number in metadata. > + * > + * It's not safe to directly use CPU logic ID number as index to > + * access metadata sequential array, e.g. when system have > + * hotplugged out CPUs, the metadata array are only allocated for > + * online CPUs but not offline CPUs, thus the CPU logic number is > + * not consistent with its index in the arrary. For this reason, > + * we need to fallback to use TraceID-metadata tuple as a reliable > + * method to access metadata. Why adding this long comment? To me all that is needed is s/traceID-CPU#/traceID-metadata . > */ > traceid_list = intlist__new(NULL); > if (!traceid_list) { > @@ -1587,8 +1612,8 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, > err = -EINVAL; > goto err_free_metadata; > } > - /* All good, associate the traceID with the CPU# */ > - inode->priv = &metadata[j][CS_ETM_CPU]; > + /* All good, associate the traceID with the metadata pointer */ > + inode->priv = metadata[j]; > } > > /* > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > index 37f8d48179ca..5d70d10f3907 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ enum { > CS_ETMV4_PRIV_MAX, > }; > > -/* RB tree for quick conversion between traceID and CPUs */ > +/* RB tree for quick conversion between traceID and metadata pointers */ > struct intlist *traceid_list; > > #define KiB(x) ((x) * 1024) > @@ -78,4 +78,6 @@ cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event __maybe_unused, > } > #endif > > +int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id, int *cpu); This function is part of a public header that can theoretically be included by any other file. As such it has to be defined within the HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT define. > + > #endif > -- > 2.17.1 >