Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1509213imu; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:15:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6vobQWOriSlVC8clN5suop3aeE6MEgtocP0hRUmpsuAZm72XuJ+NK2ZfrPjnNT44u+eJMY X-Received: by 2002:a63:4f5e:: with SMTP id p30mr4374794pgl.71.1548299701428; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:15:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548299701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=E9ZeUqmchpxMaNUEjY6WdqMDDXzzg9ygjJFRInh+h65ix2z8M0kxDRV3pWjIIaZtUg 4sTcFEj7V74474pHrYgOsKGMAbyDWUbi9wYV2sG+EFm3L4b1wwo12iMTWU/cQ/AtctfK Wo5FpY6ZUn1bQaxpKZM/15NUmpNsPw7Onj/1cbPpLmJW6eUC1+UNw3P5hSVt/nQXPge8 YZXe8omLGco4S0JYrzNsgs+W2WJI+2K8Spm7AjzcDLBJY9mROcoGrHynYoGb16VlfcNS glrthjj1ejssLvo8Ytx/KCbkz/r0GBtth5OL4w4lY38KycuNa6wpCqQnLAI8OKhl/4Ym oa9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=4gPLRuemOWBDud/vIrkHX71hRczzdOs0MgCjw5aN7ek=; b=G1aAvPLR8a91lWnbMIeC9algdl+BbAgqGS8jbzPtR26pxOtk/LEzMY3TomadBxAcXx 3RLC1UBi7CAfjBRknmW4LyQrebLXD79ySyZm6LNtjagOIxGIzPLVv9NR0/TKGr09W33Q 2hYFZP/EkmtXrc6cxfPP8gPzFztfKEzLrOgwW5CYMQO/cW76b8ZUJZOsPLyRtmaa6WRX XeNqN73kSayXRG/jjtW2HAhIrlJUI7c1Zfn+VNUuDLWBtitVCyKAjQxfQEujxS2eulxR x/UcNwUY9g78P5OL2oh90AKxhSkmZzLJF5KMzvVAfuLfsYZPs+VomhIfiybxdXXE/srv EZzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 184si20709502pgj.329.2019.01.23.19.14.46; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:15:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726986AbfAXDNZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:13:25 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2738 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726249AbfAXDNZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:13:25 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 96D199E39B34B9A1959B; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:13:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.31.96) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:13:19 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] usb: host: drop pointless static qualifier To: Alan Stern References: CC: , , , , , , , From: YueHaibing Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:13:17 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.31.96] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/1/24 0:09, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, YueHaibing wrote: > >> There is no need to have the 'dummy_mask' variable static since new >> value always be assigned before use it. >> >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing >> --- >> drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c | 2 +- >> drivers/usb/host/ohci-ps3.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c >> index 454d8c6..91cee02 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c >> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int ps3_ehci_probe(struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev) >> int result; >> struct usb_hcd *hcd; >> unsigned int virq; >> - static u64 dummy_mask; >> + u64 dummy_mask; >> >> if (usb_disabled()) { >> result = -ENODEV; >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ps3.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ps3.c >> index 395f9d3..a1c1bdf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ps3.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ps3.c >> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int ps3_ohci_probe(struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev) >> int result; >> struct usb_hcd *hcd; >> unsigned int virq; >> - static u64 dummy_mask; >> + u64 dummy_mask; >> >> if (usb_disabled()) { >> result = -ENODEV; > > No. You need to read the code and understand how a variable is used > before you decide to modify it. Sorry, I misread the code, so just leave it as is. > > In this case, a suitable approach would be to change the declaration > so that it says: > > status u64 dummy_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > > and remove the line that does the assignment dynamically. > > Alan Stern > > > . >