Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262383AbUCCKJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:09:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262386AbUCCKJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:09:50 -0500 Received: from goliath.sylaba.poznan.pl ([213.17.226.43]:22284 "EHLO goliath.sylaba.poznan.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262383AbUCCKJr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:09:47 -0500 Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3 From: Olaf =?iso-8859-2?Q?Fr=B1czyk?= To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: Robin Rosenberg , David Weinehall , Andrew Ho , Dax Kelson , Peter Nelson , Hans Reiser , linux-kernel , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ext3-users@redhat.com, jfs-discussion@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <1078307033.904.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> References: <4044119D.6050502@andrew.cmu.edu> <40453538.8050103@animezone.org> <20040303014115.GP19111@khan.acc.umu.se> <200403030700.57164.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> <1078307033.904.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078308797.2641.14.camel@venus.local.navi.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:13:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 34 On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 10:43, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 07:00, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 02:41, David Weinehall wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote: > > > > XFS is the best filesystem. > > > > > > Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of > > > ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS. > > > > > > And people say size doesn't matter. > > > > Recoverability matters to me. The driver could be 10 megabyte and > > *I* would not care. XFS seems to stand no matter how rudely the OS > > is knocked down. > > But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS, > but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard > disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery > tools were unable to deal with the error. You lost all data? Or you just had to restore them from backup? If you didn't have a backup it is your fault not XFS one :) But even if you had no backup, why didn't you move your data (using dd or something else) to another (without defects) drive, and run recovery on new drive? Regards, Olaf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/