Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262424AbUCCK1f (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:27:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262403AbUCCK1e (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:27:34 -0500 Received: from gprs40-155.eurotel.cz ([160.218.40.155]:34188 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262427AbUCCK1A (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:27:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 00:35:12 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Tom Rini Cc: George Anzinger , Kernel Mailing List , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, "Amit S. Kale" Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial Message-ID: <20040302233512.GJ1225@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040302213901.GF20227@smtp.west.cox.net> <40450468.2090700@mvista.com> <20040302221106.GH20227@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040302223143.GE1225@elf.ucw.cz> <20040302230018.GL20227@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040302230018.GL20227@smtp.west.cox.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1580 Lines: 38 On ?t 02-03-04 16:00:18, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > >Hello. The following interdiff kills kgdb_serial in favor of function > > > > >names. This only adds a weak function for kgdb_flush_io, and documents > > > > >when it would need to be provided. > > > > > > > > It looks like you are also dumping any notion of building a kernel that can > > > > choose which method of communication to use for kgdb at run time. Is this > > > > so? > > > > > > Yes, as this is how Andrew suggested we do it. It becomes quite ugly if > > > you try and allow for any 2 of 3 methods. > > > > I do not think that having kgdb_serial is so ugly. Are there any other > > uglyness associated with that? > > More precisely: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/2/11/224 Well, that just says Andrew does not care too much. I think that having both serial and ethernet support *is* good idea after all... I have few machines here, some of them do not have serial, and some of them do not have supported ethernet. It would be nice to use same kernel on all of them. Also distribution wants to have "debugging kernel", but does _not_ want to have 10 of them. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/