Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: s5p: add AES support for Exynos5433
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
From:   Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
Message-ID: <2ba3ca26-d4cd-5c9c-35a1-ab34e965fc0f@partner.samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:50:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPdPM_PpVPjJUTdg2_nJ1R2o2Rt1-XA8rPi=bLMrXeQeqw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <20190123165533.29645-1-k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
        <CGME20190123165551eucas1p1cd99462e3767dbb4feb88b996225ed21@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
        <20190123165533.29645-4-k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
        <20190124133729.GB13624@Red>
        <75f3be00-8035-0586-1611-99e5da53a8e7@partner.samsung.com>
        <CAJKOXPdPM_PpVPjJUTdg2_nJ1R2o2Rt1-XA8rPi=bLMrXeQeqw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 24.01.2019 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 15:34, Kamil Konieczny
> <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24.01.2019 14:37, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:55:33PM +0100, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>>>> Add AES crypto HW acceleration for Exynos5433, with the help of SlimSSS IP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@partner.samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c b/drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
>>>> index 0064be0e3941..e2d247f59254 100644
>>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@
>>>>  struct samsung_aes_variant {
>>>>      unsigned int                    aes_offset;
>>>>      unsigned int                    hash_offset;
>>>> +    char                            *clk_names[];
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> this could be set as const
>>
>> Definitions sets const:
>>
>> grep "static const" drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c
>>
>> static const struct samsung_aes_variant s5p_aes_data = {
>> static const struct samsung_aes_variant exynos_aes_data = {
>> static const struct samsung_aes_variant exynos5433_slim_aes_data = {
>>
>> so it is not needed at struct declaration, or am I missing something ?
> 
> The struct contains the pointer, so the pointer will be const. However
> the pointer can point to either const string or non-const string.
> That's the Corentin's comment about. So in fact as he says - this
> should be a pointer to a const string.

Thank you for clarifing this, I will send v3 soon.

-- 
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland