Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/10] powerpc: Switch to CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
References: <cover.1547195976.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
 <2e700e1c-5bd9-652e-b535-68a89dd703a1@c-s.fr>
 <87y37ax3ru.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
 <9b4dab64-6a6b-a599-4676-bf891473ada7@c-s.fr>
Message-ID: <c5b86b5b-1f38-39bf-0458-3c6572b3b35c@c-s.fr>
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:01:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9b4dab64-6a6b-a599-4676-bf891473ada7@c-s.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Le 24/01/2019 à 10:43, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 01/24/2019 01:06 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>>> Le 12/01/2019 à 10:55, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>>> The purpose of this serie is to activate CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK 
>>>> which
>>>> moves the thread_info into task_struct.
>>>>
>>>> Moving thread_info into task_struct has the following advantages:
>>>> - It protects thread_info from corruption in the case of stack
>>>> overflows.
>>>> - Its address is harder to determine if stack addresses are
>>>> leaked, making a number of attacks more difficult.
>>>
>>> I ran null_syscall and context_switch benchmark selftests and the result
>>> is surprising. There is slight degradation in context_switch and a
>>> significant one on null_syscall:
>>>
>>> Without the serie:
>>>
>>> ~# chrt -f 98 ./context_switch --no-altivec --no-vector --no-fp
>>> 55542
>>> 55562
>>> 55564
>>> 55562
>>> 55568
>>> ...
>>>
>>> ~# ./null_syscall
>>>      2546.71 ns     336.17 cycles
>>>
>>>
>>> With the serie:
>>>
>>> ~# chrt -f 98 ./context_switch --no-altivec --no-vector --no-fp
>>> 55138
>>> 55142
>>> 55152
>>> 55144
>>> 55142
>>>
>>> ~# ./null_syscall
>>>      3479.54 ns     459.30 cycles
>>>
>>> So 0,8% less context switches per second and 37% more time for one 
>>> syscall ?
>>>
>>> Any idea ?
>>
>> What platform is that on?
> 
> It is on the 8xx
> 
>>
>> On 64-bit we have to turn one mtmsrd into two and that's obviously a
>> slow down. But I don't see that you've done anything similar in 32-bit
>> code.
>>
>> I assume it's patch 8 that causes the slow down?
> 
> I have not digged into it yet, but why patch 8 ?
> 

The increase of null_syscall duration happens with patch 5 when we 
activate CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK.

Christophe