Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:22:00 +0000
From:   linuxgpletc@redchan.it
To:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Cc:     Ivan Ivanov <qmastery16@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org,
        misc@openbsd.org, rms@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security
In-Reply-To: <3efc6268-747d-0841-4249-5804fa9095ca@metux.net>
References: <fe8a4e103943d671ff0ce2c4f09609f9@redchan.it>
 <CAAaskFDMjUzonLeHPmiy_VcB=jvQfF9giEaWcmNLKHDTqQt4BA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3efc6268-747d-0841-4249-5804fa9095ca@metux.net>
Message-ID: <a4ae3c98c10eeac39c404b60a0e4d538@redchan.it>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-01-24 15:31, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> Do you have some actual proposals / patches ?

Sue Open Source Security / Bradly Spengler for copyright infringement. 
Seek his profits as damages. I doubt you'll be able to get specific 
performance since the GPL is not a contact in this instance. (If you 
registered your copyright prior to the violation you can alternatively 
go for statutory damages + attoneys fees btw)

He is _blatantly_ violating your copyright by adding an additional 
restrictive term regarding the distribution of his non-separable 
derivative work of the linux kernel code.