Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2226732imu; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:12:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7iQJhmarv6KvWnPPHF+IWMU/fPuw/UH0K2S+8bIsCPsFk/SEp/H5IrChDe5KRuzn+hskv9 X-Received: by 2002:a62:8dd9:: with SMTP id p86mr7198663pfk.143.1548349949634; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:12:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548349949; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l7QASb4oqSYzRZhTrPtIaUdrpkTSiQvl8I82C6oTlhpLZLh6zEDSzbVqteqHIaRbyn 1byoDGDOKjF5LrVpf19B8cDrclZp/OBsVaDL/NWfo0UZ6OfRXejQDrRIcZOi24ygik4G ckw2WabSRhBrseeqe9Iv6Ppv7bf9nNc6N1lrUB441+z1x3JfV6VZQVwYnV0zqRTVQf6U oNzIY7aST6lI0Oc4St15gX+Snd9dWRFduERS5JJAQ4xZVzOh7BwhM84URLd+ymHfqz6i ollu7L4f1qPczWYtsr2smR9ezrgaspvUg9XJEs7BXylLsG4tHAAlG4WUqq6FLlOXZcJw e+fg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=MtXm0sViJBkiwTNaNBiG8FrxjGnTmg3PFILuSrlfHYU=; b=VbDjOA3ekKeRLZaSTLpMLSw5nLDYikr1NGvYLHWCse77fooxwUEyEYg5KfeAeNM53Y STftoF9BIKfr0BZaDvJxXEy480eg5dFSRmfI0bt+5k8jhl+4aulLWQU0M0Qvfe3RJSDh nWjJJj2G6lK0i/5en+uZ2MDWf9+xh7GgdxlpYzHx8y34j/Zci/UjVPLPZSo1eRaOjSHH 9i0GFPNuJ7pVpDHiuaIYJt1OQCoK4A2QAO0Xm2b6Ntx60e9mjlrc/BW0ASPVhnrJiAIn 6k1CTgN6i8lBN1dbVo5zaotZ6y3aIbJtBXHWgtVRJWgOXwW2rQLC8a6KXzj6gOCtzAbx H11g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=xX6lqGbw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l30si22588899plg.113.2019.01.24.09.12.13; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:12:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=xX6lqGbw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728888AbfAXRMF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:12:05 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49096 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727573AbfAXRME (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:12:04 -0500 Received: from earth.universe (tmo-116-177.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.116.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AD702184C; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:12:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548349923; bh=5P98kFxsApaMTMrQLVTD4P/w5ZamWC+rXZU8wbFbCbg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xX6lqGbwK1LWd8uQtipMyFEOJeigu/FgL/tLZ3r+To7i4tWDKnJESc0i7FyDBm99a t/ruOe3k4BTF6SAA0Wpgj8+Qt3349fcWs0WVxVdiyvIqAbo5naF5/eBplGI/6t6Cjn qNZpZfM2Sc37YiOdB07vYGioPe4c3NoxSlE8vva0= Received: by earth.universe (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 400CA3C08DF; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:11:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:11:58 +0100 From: Sebastian Reichel To: Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] power: reset: at91-reset: add support for sam9x60 SoC Message-ID: <20190124171158.bi74cnxngsjcawwn@earth.universe> References: <7e68a0298b8802edaead1f9c011f9c2e191ecf6a.1547629763.git.nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> <20190123183443.ppxdfstmau2xtodi@earth.universe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3hmt5rtfj35e5bjm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --3hmt5rtfj35e5bjm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:34:50AM +0000, Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com wrote: > Hi Sebastian, >=20 > On 23/01/2019 at 19:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility > >> string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > >> --- > >> drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at= 91-reset.c > >> index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c > >> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c > >> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type { > >> RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG =3D 2, > >> RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE =3D 3, > >> RESET_TYPE_USER =3D 4, > >> + RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL =3D 6, > >> + RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL =3D 7, > >> + RESET_TYPE_ULP2 =3D 8, > >=20 > > what happened to 5? :) >=20 > That a good question ;-) >=20 > It's marked as "Reserved"... which opens up a whole new field of=20 > speculation :-) Ok :) > [..] >=20 > >> { .compatible =3D "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data =3D samx7_restart }, > >> + { .compatible =3D "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data =3D samx7_restart = }, > >> { /* sentinel */ } > >> }; > >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match); > >=20 > > Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that > > Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback. >=20 > What about merging this patch with the whole series through the at91=20 > then arm-soc trees? It seems to be possible to merge this standalone, but merging through at91/arm-soc is also fine with me. Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel -- Sebastian --3hmt5rtfj35e5bjm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAlxJ8d4ACgkQ2O7X88g7 +prYRw//eRpCrw2o9rSRDF1wuaqVT8k3sgEoM3G9V+hWk243agZ5b+ahgAG70hrw I9eV6psmHguTnxDgmCowpaKc0r+Ep/g3wOSOJCD7Qnp9dtlyVJyPPUYfaIULKasN MlAJp7zHydM+7o7H9hHpVDmq+X7LLX6ZXye5hbCOFjzFwfq3CAehZknRHPnOTMtZ Mym/E+sqKemS49cBUyGxK+WDe2zQ/ZjTldaVvJ72zzwJTCqSevPZHs687uNYa0YE K7fH1y3AtO6IDQC63nL/aZd2z/r00/2/7u9QdkgdAHI35+LtKfscyuUUxE64AERB XXAvksjAYbEsIyMcxsFSDTrGzqg6PVxSTbXgGt08vosBaOTOhSCmxbb3THvWHWmG uZBTHr6TSyDdti/epp0+PYocWcn5CxY2HhwqJIxFYO75o8K3jFtYefuRP8KgTccX uiSwxWovPWj8cs3m5o87QL1kVAtsCn+Rib5pyZf8vdbmun4B3Rb01iCS1aam03oH jvb0PQedQ/PpO5RsBOZtxihWeXhVjDPzTp4JAc8e8TAaeVVwCvCDQOW2Kcy2q9IU fjEbQE0tFSUE6JcWriI1ZEszCLOWUdbxXv/eaxMjmAwALGYHv54WJQUMo1rlMRsu 1UMuorDWmoN6PBTMmmJR4+yWI9VSAdO8TTApCYTafu/byJh/pig= =OZfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3hmt5rtfj35e5bjm--