Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2348269imu; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:09:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN65HfVM2zsGGeGytziCiEyLPGIrRQVDavbGTNlOx07+xvw1NBVD5Xnf1gF2EhSNz8cqxC3h X-Received: by 2002:a65:520a:: with SMTP id o10mr7288266pgp.276.1548356946417; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:09:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548356946; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rEE4QAc1q1tEK6BREW3etBkOSZFR9mFCPPAm9ALKc4OQIb5bF6YtO/iPA+ptByYHyy GTFPcVz4tap8BkCmMR1Pjln8V4Orjpv2M3jtdjMdKMZLAdLsPKBvO99ECjEQOz7hdWkm nNhsiMehyMOZPBg6D5Qj5FES/Qqe4/sDN8DrSgt2rpruClo5NuIG5S0CPLwyvovUZCd1 0NPvcoTGSw9eQl5AJpTRyetsioA1AwycztY8H2pKPbBLa1urdeMGwTbrGMSwT1wy+8Ch q8BF3y5wd25pZKBP35yv9pwiWeM+oU+EU3DksmnxUzHJAKX2PwiR82jet4CkkOsz3Kd7 LsOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=5HAlnhLAoBmfIEFlc5IuE+LccvsYeEOgvHsWi98sPHw=; b=kCbYipO76+RJcCvgru9H3K1fNJ8sYzu8yEIc5gW5HjJ+jBRm7or7zSVFY7WTtmv/Mn rXEUCuwHZ3YVWmQNHlo0nm7QhArGi+LQu4YsjzKxQ65G1u7CyDwSxQKHMo4N6aXrctFx XG7b0se0vdx/U392LxseCDOrBatTjhAeHrF2IFCHLpAJjdfF/5wlMC+QDmKE9+pgDlhu NccrOtcorqJ/VmbncoZ34zj/7kOG18YMjaj7Sn1ypIXVc2szFhl1GtMi3UQAEKhEGe6u bgwINVEgpEZ4pVzQ1RwvMqQMdi1evUmAm9NJmJ9kqydnNCiGVGhNb1jFAa+3Y3MRpYB2 PhAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q32si22993215pgm.410.2019.01.24.11.08.50; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728916AbfAXTIZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:08:25 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34396 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725909AbfAXTIY (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:08:24 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FABCAE52; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:08:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: "Sameer Pujar" Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/tegra: enable clock during probe In-Reply-To: <1548351403-1875-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> References: <1548351403-1875-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:36:43 +0100, Sameer Pujar wrote: > > If CONFIG_PM is disabled or runtime PM calls are forbidden, the clocks > will not be ON. This could cause issue during probe, where hda init > setup is done. This patch checks whether runtime PM is enabled or not. > If disabled, clocks are enabled in probe() and disabled in remove() > > This patch does following minor changes as cleanup, > * return code check for pm_runtime_get_sync() to take care of failure > and exit gracefully. > * In remove path runtime PM is disabled before calling snd_card_free(). > * hda_tegra_disable_clocks() is moved out of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP check. > * runtime PM callbacks moved out of CONFIG_PM check > > Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar > Reviewed-by: Ravindra Lokhande > Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter (snip) > @@ -555,6 +553,13 @@ static int hda_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!azx_has_pm_runtime(chip)) > pm_runtime_forbid(hda->dev); > > + /* explicit resume if runtime PM is disabled */ > + if (!pm_runtime_enabled(hda->dev)) { > + err = hda_tegra_runtime_resume(hda->dev); > + if (err) > + goto out_free; > + } > + > schedule_work(&hda->probe_work); Calling runtime_resume here is really confusing... > @@ -571,7 +576,14 @@ static void hda_tegra_probe_work(struct work_struct *work) > struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hda->dev); > int err; > > - pm_runtime_get_sync(hda->dev); > + err = pm_runtime_get_sync(hda->dev); > + if (err < 0) { > + dev_err(hda->dev, > + "failed in pm_runtime_get_syc with err = %d\n", > + err); > + return; > + } This pm_runtime_get_sync() is needed just because you enabled runtime PM before probe_work. Why not deferring the runtime PM enablement after probing done? That is what we need is the hda_tegra_enable_clocks() call at probe unconditionally before enabling runtime PM. > err = hda_tegra_first_init(chip, pdev); > if (err < 0) > goto out_free; > @@ -599,12 +611,13 @@ static void hda_tegra_probe_work(struct work_struct *work) > > static int hda_tegra_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - int ret; > - > - ret = snd_card_free(dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev)); > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); > + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev)) { > + hda_tegra_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev); > + } > - return ret; > + return snd_card_free(dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev)); Forcing the suspend *before* snd_card_free() doesn't sound right. It's the point before the disconnect and release procedure of all the rest. That is, the other hardware components are still active at this point. thanks, Takashi