Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2404424imu; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:10:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5MkaOAB/avfp3L0r4i0kM31SzyqSeWPwbcbrNtnruafW/GTQxzydbep9JlO8vVidCbJzrK X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b88:: with SMTP id w8mr7866652pll.320.1548360652777; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:10:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548360652; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XxpD4KftGruoa1tc2T2UiLipM5Sz4IUs3GTyqUT8hcak3sqsBe787hkbqchM01Mmo2 WX66gsKSUHQx06SqccvysJqUxTPRXfCIYEBuUqEsSJY59f6LNgwN10Ymk3rJu2l2M1sO wqsFeB9JtAoGShJyCMlzJKf2qzzUvxmd6MpnAGhCmJrvui4cdk7Ehob8haGGlk09j7M4 kgKmEuqmxo2EcAea7qDIIxO/VyaSBP4mEjZIvYbETMYZcCKWPamKf36IV3iCPwcAvniJ xbp4A2ccn4hacZtzuAybfENcXw5wqyraC07kG0G9fXvy9sS3nurzoEIBoAq3cEtoWjmu KInQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=7yZJbLu3Mb3vB8Lwe0++sGUx0wb2E5r1lCY+YxF7FRU=; b=rmQ+LxSURI8caDcmdtzhMKLEwbP4ot2dRJ1RGsjo9NRc549TmAI/XCaPOQmzvz6kjw 9Ry7YBQ0G2QDKi5TGnyxydUE2NOd0JRniLFDMHphgttUVNjHw7toGxpCY5qX0KI6fCgx d/E5ZrnlyPSXKq7ZdUYCBm5smQQ9W5BatHn+KM3Te7BAi8XApNbKU8ySzvUdubc5VAVX ER6CBSN1qufYsA+XymrwyCAEW/s3YovNthISykOSM93GMwGqHJ1O6WrWS8rVLbqaiYHq bfIC1YRaFn7r2Vzdj9BIiEm89OEWJgCtn2ih5V9tnAaA8GSGnStVDf/lFZ9WRCqDLIlF 5HcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=geRS0rSF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a8si22304601pgi.359.2019.01.24.12.10.37; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=geRS0rSF; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731003AbfAXT2e (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:28:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55260 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730992AbfAXT2d (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:28:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05CC9218A6; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:28:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548358111; bh=02eYOIJVjPt1I18rkBiBWj2XZ54sBQL7K4w67yQ7N2E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=geRS0rSFwDxTLyY76b85IHUl3vh0hR96kUXqMcI5Pcc7rcYNiSBbcvDkUX5opwrkd lMXfiiDdZWYMiUhNiNoYguqM5EyD2zA5CNDkOYZ+/1dNR54gfHnVdAFyFOU+cOFE88 kyhidD+tjJaXPrsih0gQ4MCne+oZiNR9YWTDqYb0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , Dan Williams , David Rientjes , Mike Rapoport , Vlastimil Babka , Paul Oppenheimer , William Kucharski , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 102/104] mm, proc: be more verbose about unstable VMA flags in /proc//smaps Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:20:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20190124190205.742790616@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190124190154.968308875@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190124190154.968308875@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 7550c6079846a24f30d15ac75a941c8515dbedfb ] Patch series "THP eligibility reporting via proc". This series of three patches aims at making THP eligibility reporting much more robust and long term sustainable. The trigger for the change is a regression report [2] and the long follow up discussion. In short the specific application didn't have good API to query whether a particular mapping can be backed by THP so it has used VMA flags to workaround that. These flags represent a deep internal state of VMAs and as such they should be used by userspace with a great deal of caution. A similar has happened for [3] when users complained that VM_MIXEDMAP is no longer set on DAX mappings. Again a lack of a proper API led to an abuse. The first patch in the series tries to emphasise that that the semantic of flags might change and any application consuming those should be really careful. The remaining two patches provide a more suitable interface to address [2] and provide a consistent API to query the THP status both for each VMA and process wide as well. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181120103515.25280-1-mhocko@kernel.org [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809241054050.224429@chino.kir.corp.google.com [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002100531.GC4135@quack2.suse.cz This patch (of 3): Even though vma flags exported via /proc//smaps are explicitly documented to be not guaranteed for future compatibility the warning doesn't go far enough because it doesn't mention semantic changes to those flags. And they are important as well because these flags are a deep implementation internal to the MM code and the semantic might change at any time. Let's consider two recent examples: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181002100531.GC4135@quack2.suse.cz : commit e1fb4a086495 "dax: remove VM_MIXEDMAP for fsdax and device dax" has : removed VM_MIXEDMAP flag from DAX VMAs. Now our testing shows that in the : mean time certain customer of ours started poking into /proc//smaps : and looks at VMA flags there and if VM_MIXEDMAP is missing among the VMA : flags, the application just fails to start complaining that DAX support is : missing in the kernel. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809241054050.224429@chino.kir.corp.google.com : Commit 1860033237d4 ("mm: make PR_SET_THP_DISABLE immediately active") : introduced a regression in that userspace cannot always determine the set : of vmas where thp is ineligible. : Userspace relies on the "nh" flag being emitted as part of /proc/pid/smaps : to determine if a vma is eligible to be backed by hugepages. : Previous to this commit, prctl(PR_SET_THP_DISABLE, 1) would cause thp to : be disabled and emit "nh" as a flag for the corresponding vmas as part of : /proc/pid/smaps. After the commit, thp is disabled by means of an mm : flag and "nh" is not emitted. : This causes smaps parsing libraries to assume a vma is eligible for thp : and ends up puzzling the user on why its memory is not backed by thp. In both cases userspace was relying on a semantic of a specific VMA flag. The primary reason why that happened is a lack of a proper interface. While this has been worked on and it will be fixed properly, it seems that our wording could see some refinement and be more vocal about semantic aspect of these flags as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211143641.3503-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Jan Kara Acked-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: David Rientjes Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Dan Williams Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Paul Oppenheimer Cc: William Kucharski Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt index 6d2689ebf824..5b87946a53a3 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt @@ -466,7 +466,9 @@ manner. The codes are the following: Note that there is no guarantee that every flag and associated mnemonic will be present in all further kernel releases. Things get changed, the flags may -be vanished or the reverse -- new added. +be vanished or the reverse -- new added. Interpretation of their meaning +might change in future as well. So each consumer of these flags has to +follow each specific kernel version for the exact semantic. This file is only present if the CONFIG_MMU kernel configuration option is enabled. -- 2.19.1