Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262518AbUCCQ5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:57:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262516AbUCCQ5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:57:18 -0500 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:22029 "EHLO dualathlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262511AbUCCQ5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:57:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:57:46 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, wli@holomorphy.com, dmccr@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: 230-objrmap fixes for 2.6.3-mjb2 Message-ID: <20040303165746.GO4922@dualathlon.random> References: <20040303070933.GB4922@dualathlon.random> <20040303025820.2cf6078a.akpm@osdl.org> <7440000.1078328791@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7440000.1078328791@[10.10.2.4]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1378 Lines: 31 On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:46:32AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > --Andrew Morton wrote (on Wednesday, March 03, 2004 02:58:20 -0800): > > > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > >> > >> --- sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c.~1~ 2004-03-03 06:45:38.995594456 +0100 > >> +++ sles-objrmap/mm/rmap.c 2004-03-03 07:01:39.200621104 +0100 > >> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ try_to_unmap_obj_one(struct vm_area_stru > >> if (!pte) > >> goto out; > >> > >> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) { > >> + if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED|VM_RESERVED)) { > >> ret = SWAP_FAIL; > >> goto out_unmap; > > > > I keep on wanting to put that in there too. But pages in a VM_RESERVED vma > > should not find their way onto the LRU. Maybe we should be checking for > > that in do_no_page(). > > There was talk at one point of moving the "unswappable" state down into > the struct page. Is that still realistic? It would seem rather more > efficient, but I forget what problem we ran into with it. that already exists and it's PG_reserved, but it's inefficient compared to VM_RESERVED, since it forces the vm to check all ptes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/