Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262539AbUCCS27 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:28:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262540AbUCCS26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:28:58 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:10646 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262539AbUCCS25 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:28:57 -0500 To: "Tolentino, Matthew E" Cc: Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables References: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 03 Mar 2004 01:15:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 18 "Tolentino, Matthew E" writes: > > I have rewritten and compiled tested the boot_ioremap code but I don't > > have a configuration to test it. This effects the EFI code and the > > numa srat code. It might be worth replacing boot_ioremap with __va() > > to reduce the amount of error checking necessary. > > I just blindly applied this patch and tried it on an x86 EFI system > with no luck. It's not mapping correctly for some reason. I'll look > at the problem closer in a bit. Stupid question. What is efi doing in arch/i386 anyway? All of the to be production efi x86 systems I have heard of support x86-64. So shouldn't it be 64bit calls that we need to worry about? Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/