Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp597505imu; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:39:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5KIUR/Z00EEWvKcdCBdf1NROPb0qcX4u6V8UmU7wNg5l6mb5lHoMYFc2Bncz3xr7oqJzUx X-Received: by 2002:a63:6d48:: with SMTP id i69mr9990618pgc.215.1548430784079; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:39:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548430784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KJyXV0CYRzWngeqrJNNYgVdQV+7GRI49v15bVd6Nda4dr++nK4/LG3T6wBdMglsEbr +zlXHwF0+WgwqziU765dKnSZBfLjzDP169kbYWtpIpY39yQopi0ZjYgbIm5tiPKYBSA3 /9Lwi8sFH3KSNWJY/XIAWPw/F1qsQ1cA8V4Kifg5+J0yfvuZnnQ7fW+GYZt6ZlOixjy8 0WSPP7P0RShdQKun7msasRA2kJd8XYbTnpb/vW8kUatnxURwH8TUzJWvgX26tDucL20D OqEnwNTkp1ecVt2w2LxUZRZn9brlEZWjzYkmjXZDKgRlH/pESLjmxOFL0ZNCCiiEoE8/ hwQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ajMHrHBoR3jBcOf5TACSnTKZ2AsNP8IrjKRrgmIi/RQ=; b=BYHG62WElkrD5GPEszjYUb5FH2+dN/qzW7y2083ejK1yKcMkqrgAUvMNnhU8kb8+/e /EjSAV2YCxBilTLT6Kegzo8hjpJnyz9JO8zntRYC66rL0TngA6gFufzUZWJskiLfDOZZ bFVtlwPfhc5hrgbVCgILw4oQzzCOem5eXpSdoYcm5n8jSdov7OXjoH87oXwWnBMAA7ut L9mP3BUyLvbu9vMpf5jiwWKgFMuOEh55Chtr8NKrmp+XAK84j8TGsyXIGF1o7M0cH68j A/CRtTs+kAXN1G6LNf5SFYhbYKkJ4ZLl29/PoNS8wukjYNkEWFQacwOprclv1FN7AG70 P24Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z136si14416396pgz.28.2019.01.25.07.39.28; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:39:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727749AbfAYPjV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:39:21 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38711 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726265AbfAYPjU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:39:20 -0500 Received: from [79.234.67.100] (helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gn3Zb-0006TU-Oe; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:39:15 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:39:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Zhenzhong Duan cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, x86@kernel.org, srinivas.eeda@oracle.com, bp@suse.de, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Update TIF_SPEC_IB before ibpb barrier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <48a105d3-fa32-40e4-9775-37d49f42eac0@default> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > > > When a task is set for updating TIF_SPEC_IB throuth SECCOMP by others > > and it's scheduled in the first time, a stale TIF_SPEC_IB value is > > picked in cond_ibpb(). This is due to TIF_SPEC_IB is updated later at > > __switch_to_xtra(). > > > > Add an extra call to speculation_ctrl_update_tif() to update it before > > IBPB barrier. > > Errm. No. It adds that call to speculation_ctrl_update_tif() for every > mm switch, most of the time for nothing. > > If at all, and we discussed that before and decided not to worry about it > (because it gets fixed up on the next context switch), then you want to > handle ibpb() from there: Actually we need to do that. It's not only the scheduled in first problem. That whole thing might become completely stale in either direction. Care to whip up a patch? Thanks, tglx