Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp730168imu; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5ReGR+ih6mdx9ZXyVAE9YOVqaPI+HT24/jsHDFLHFwRl/0kQCykweOyM9IZ3YE2g+aBCh0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d70b:: with SMTP id w11mr12166328ply.294.1548438962448; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548438962; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qHz5tf9xpUWBrxxOrRRgJWyUP+xwc9bOBxl3XxaEwp+PeHY+md+1LB6E36LDRGyLdK WAGxcpJFsz9Q4JLhJv1rOFWOx3VZow0yYMyhYkNlLd9wPYyxKydBMcDY+g/JPXWgFT+f dLU59jZ9R4p6niiJMQHUw8/ZmCGztWGaq1Lo/2S1mYyb583jaCR5+IGs9k+d2cXW99AH cfzLGzhV0k4T0ssdEjTh4/DG4vKHDYG0kwC+aa1b7jzfDfLiCOP2d2GYUVVxrdnLzUX9 8BE/kC0QeuCaYWbwCdVSc3JEoK03G3vGFqhFVFDVQPd57VEe4EMGu1RT/rEnqoqu42mG 949g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=ND7a0QYTrwVH+TcGa3x65a/n5roinhyM3Mk2kJyImzQ=; b=IWMKk9jf8luywDYE+mqAkM6qn6n2TJo4q+Jl/T2narybeqcA6cXvrMqsIfGNyVNKOA S0mtFKw8EcT/C75P2TDdHxrWHcgIx7h0KOvaacJo9QhTErSVn81TT7K4Ms2XNhjfJ59z WA0bwzIR0wUJB7a6PcfXUujNxeCaWYDautThpdSjNVSC+XLsw94GEAAh+fvH4L+1/DEz jPQY9WIw94FrwDaze2MftyeFm9H3PDF74KB/DM7ocjeDqyT5wy7atn/RRn3ygy8YrHCl NYlFZWmkD1IAlfl3o44BzxaCprDws4CxkF/EKrZv1cj8WFEBEqUZsfloDQJ8XAHD8MmS N09w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w15si23268243plk.357.2019.01.25.09.55.47; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729041AbfAYRzn (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:55:43 -0500 Received: from anholt.net ([50.246.234.109]:42046 "EHLO anholt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726347AbfAYRzm (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:55:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anholt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F70D10A2AAF; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:55:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anholt.net Received: from anholt.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kingsolver.anholt.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7U6N0DRL8bbt; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from eliezer.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anholt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EE710A0E8E; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by eliezer.anholt.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01A7E2FE3A6F; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:55:39 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Anholt To: Paul Kocialkowski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Airlie , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Petazzoni , Eben Upton , Daniel Vetter , Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/vc4: Wait for display list synchronization when completing commit In-Reply-To: <0d136757267f4457527838065a5bf60fd6781835.camel@bootlin.com> References: <20190108145056.2276-1-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> <20190108145056.2276-2-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> <87d0onussr.fsf@anholt.net> <0d136757267f4457527838065a5bf60fd6781835.camel@bootlin.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.2+1~gb0bcfaa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:55:39 -0800 Message-ID: <87k1isvcys.fsf@anholt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Kocialkowski writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:34 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Paul Kocialkowski writes: >>=20 >> > During an atomic commit, the HVS is configured with a display list >> > for the channel matching the associated CRTC. The Pixel Valve (CRTC) >> > and encoder are also configured for the new setup at that time. >> > While the Pixel Valve and encoder are reconfigured synchronously, the >> > HVS is only reconfigured after the display list address (DISPLIST) has >> > been updated to the current display list address (DISPLACTX), which is >> > the responsibility of the hardware. >> >=20 >> > The time frame during which the HVS is still running on its previous >> > configuration but the CRTC and encoder have been reconfigured already >> > can lead to a number of synchronization issues. They will eventually >> > cause errors reported on the FIFOs, such as underruns. >> >=20 >> > With underrun detection enabled (from Boris Brezillon's series), this >> > leads to unreliable underrun detection with random false positives. >> >=20 >> > To ensure a coherent state, wait for each enabled channel of the HVS >> > to synchronize its current display list address. This fixes the issue >> > of random underrun reporting on commits. >> >=20 >> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski >> > --- >> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 1 + >> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c | 2 ++ >> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_regs.h | 2 ++ >> > 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+) >> >=20 >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_d= rv.h >> > index c24b078f0593..955f157f5ad0 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h >> > @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ void vc4_irq_reset(struct drm_device *dev); >> > extern struct platform_driver vc4_hvs_driver; >> > void vc4_hvs_dump_state(struct drm_device *dev); >> > int vc4_hvs_debugfs_regs(struct seq_file *m, void *unused); >> > +void vc4_hvs_sync_dlist(struct drm_device *dev); >> >=20=20 >> > /* vc4_kms.c */ >> > int vc4_kms_load(struct drm_device *dev); >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_h= vs.c >> > index 5d8c749c9749..1ba60b8e0c2d 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hvs.c >> > @@ -166,6 +166,23 @@ static int vc4_hvs_upload_linear_kernel(struct vc= 4_hvs *hvs, >> > return 0; >> > } >> >=20=20 >> > +void vc4_hvs_sync_dlist(struct drm_device *dev) >> > +{ >> > + struct vc4_dev *vc4 =3D to_vc4_dev(dev); >> > + unsigned int i; >> > + int ret; >> > + >> > + for (i =3D 0; i < SCALER_CHANNELS_COUNT; i++) { >> > + if (!(HVS_READ(SCALER_DISPCTRLX(i)) & SCALER_DISPCTRLX_ENABLE)) >> > + continue; >> > + >> > + ret =3D wait_for(HVS_READ(SCALER_DISPLACTX(i)) =3D=3D >> > + HVS_READ(SCALER_DISPLISTX(i)), 1000); >> > + WARN(ret, "Timeout waiting for channel %d display list sync\n", >> > + i); >> > + } >> > +} >> > + >> > static int vc4_hvs_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, vo= id *data) >> > { >> > struct platform_device *pdev =3D to_platform_device(dev); >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_k= ms.c >> > index 0490edb192a1..2d66a2b57a91 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c >> > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ vc4_atomic_complete_commit(struct drm_atomic_state= *state) >> >=20=20 >> > drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(state); >> >=20=20 >> > + vc4_hvs_sync_dlist(dev); >> > + >> > drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done(dev, state); >>=20 >> wait_for_flip_done should already be waiting for DISPLACTX to match our >> crtc's display list, though, right (see vc4_crtc_handle_page_flip())? >> This seems like a no-op to me. > > Right, at this stage it's pretty much a no-op. It does make a > difference when bringing-in vc4_hvs_unmask_underrun, because this > vc4_hvs_sync_dlist call comes before it. > > When the display lists are not yet synchronized (and differ), an > underrun occurs so it will be reported although it's not related to the > new display list configuration. Waiting for the display lists to sync > before unmasking the interrupt prevents that. > > I think waiting for the page flip to unmask the underrun interrupt > would be too late because the HVS should have finished processing the > new dlist by then (but maybe I'm mistaken about that), so we would miss > the underrun indication. For load tracking I'm mainly concerned about making sure that we don't have long-standing underruns -- if the first frame after a modeset is a little wonky, you probably won't notice it. Getting a clean modeset sequence would be really nice to have, just... don't block on that. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE/JuuFDWp9/ZkuCBXtdYpNtH8nugFAlxLTZsACgkQtdYpNtH8 nuicQQ//YmWlLLiza+wJ0yYUT46tUaGrkzjVwdvhQKhxmuc0cSRUQ9wUqtN+jjCS abOB9ZMa1ZTKdFmRaGfmVx6+OWjMXG/sA29BmrbWXfQpBNgt3g7ij9LRDqqMXqmP XVnJb6UYB4yiEpHYb+Af7RKaOoSBdXETOozTN3+7bgfHw2VEtDAjETEpXDSYy4ah QAKEjD31Agh/GyoJT7if/XSW3mp9bO/TzkHN4t+4ZaLV6zi8m5gNnDwxTSRt/4sX +GerFWdL/hT2lN57QAdbk7osWJ2xA60hLfjv+EhCD3+DJjbgb9+3JHfzrVroxd0M O7ygR+5hj3NjRxFuraLIKOE/5c1izBXWOtM5U4XB+iU7ln0F80/N4Vm/4NCZXOx/ fQsMtDNBxrwjVd/DSY/WQg6ZT0fJEHLIwVAs2ogGPoZ6iFZBODbH/fcEhmxqcrAL wRxijjXZI/Z8IGvTUy5N19I2b6OJAqxNSbo1Vbfe8qzo2zfNzyxwryllrQo5I0Zp nDOVCf/uMlMQ8TZuV2yEw9tz58s/EQhOZ3/IKv80tsqTXiIGUgoMEzw/n1yewG8Z 9Sd8oYBBphAKpnulA4Cv/Xhg9QVCNkxLLxOD2+qN2KbbzuL3+eSXDRzstLYffuAl oggTBGG7MnzZfJf83+i8z/VUO4lvuJB9U7dg+UhzMvqJWwYtrMM= =NwCF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--