Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp742451imu; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:08:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN74Te1U3GFzFzIBsbticHhj1MQlpyAUH7rWtXm2o4MkwvM1S4LvozfwxtlsDKThhz14WOTd X-Received: by 2002:a62:44d8:: with SMTP id m85mr12076365pfi.164.1548439696222; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:08:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548439696; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FTwtvEhffB5iD371fPCDkYW527+hq7W4qtqjzdHXW4AT5MmHzcRM0z+Uax9guh0b0g 2p1FG3heqLAKhf4Tef+pmU7ijGnukQlWhOAZ/9ShmhA55hSj4l17K3w8KlXmgatLMWJE haFhSlraCH4pG0CAh1TTKm+GVEa7d/880lIbPi419zfg3RxOJz5O6/+6WP6YxyhHijx8 L3yVz8W8jAbMT5rPZy480RlYsjlwwAB4pejY1Sxtby6kBb37cR6oMXaI4eS6Q1zTYkj9 zLQGBjTnBtWF2se/blvXXVNhcqtptwC5iC4EUJQlHm2o93oUbwjiz8ll+bqorBQE5rwm rQFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=a5oNyZGTQ2F2LFggFWd+lraHCqPAxS6UAPz8kYq9P3E=; b=QndU1v+J0PN/FNkQOVQwoMYywg9Nt6JnIyA8/f0TjeuMnIILJkDTq3UyT+PNQQ1nOK bD3mE5zEylYj9UBG2ft5cq2YEBQrdORLvgXl6bMvC8gVMjEHvm+b4jOQTwmbzmp3UxHp D1ElHuL/fNV/2YURvZ2e1adO2TI4a0umdKw+wd5WH8m+GDvdRV2CbqDYHqLNV5SnxINy h9paI8JEKAt0HPCiw2VJ0ReQ10XamdoHQGPVBnA+8v9Wspayf+y8tVjQjKwyhYWf6HMw iYL9A1nODve9li5lI+1dgLPArh11e6DmlduwYZW1C3J4tBUmSvbTrsjW0tgXguGnzMJs JtIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v35si25073179pgl.130.2019.01.25.10.08.01; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:08:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729413AbfAYSHf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:07:35 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51888 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729364AbfAYSHd (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:07:33 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E219EBD; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:07:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from beelzebub.austin.arm.com (beelzebub.austin.arm.com [10.118.12.119]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B65B33F5AF; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:07:32 -0800 (PST) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, dave.martin@arm.com, shankerd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ykaukab@suse.de, julien.thierry@arm.com, mlangsdo@redhat.com, steven.price@arm.com, stefan.wahren@i2se.com, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v4 11/12] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for speculative store bypass Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:07:10 -0600 Message-Id: <20190125180711.1970973-12-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 In-Reply-To: <20190125180711.1970973-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20190125180711.1970973-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return status based on ssbd_state and the arm64 SSBS feature. If the mitigation is disabled, or the firmware isn't responding then return the expected machine state based on a new blacklist of known vulnerable cores. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index caedf268c972..e9ae8e5fd7e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void) DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required); int ssbd_state __read_mostly = ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL; +static bool __ssb_safe = true; static const struct ssbd_options { const char *str; @@ -362,10 +363,16 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, { struct arm_smccc_res res; bool required = true; + bool is_vul; s32 val; WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible()); + is_vul = is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), entry->midr_range_list); + + if (is_vul) + __ssb_safe = false; + if (this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) { required = false; goto out_printmsg; @@ -399,6 +406,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN; return false; + /* machines with mixed mitigation requirements must not return this */ case SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED: pr_info_once("%s mitigation not required\n", entry->desc); ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED; @@ -454,6 +462,16 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, return required; } +/* known vulnerable cores */ +static const struct midr_range arm64_ssb_cpus[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A57), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A72), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A73), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A75), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A76), + {}, +}; + static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) { @@ -743,6 +761,7 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { .capability = ARM64_SSBD, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, .matches = has_ssbd_mitigation, + .midr_range_list = arm64_ssb_cpus, }, #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 { @@ -784,4 +803,30 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); } +ssize_t cpu_show_spec_store_bypass(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + /* + * Two assumptions: First, get_ssbd_state() reflects the worse case + * for hetrogenous machines, and that if SSBS is supported its + * supported by all cores. + */ + switch (arm64_get_ssbd_state()) { + case ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED: + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + case ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL: + case ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE: + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + return sprintf(buf, + "Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled\n"); + } + + if (__ssb_safe) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); +} + #endif -- 2.17.2