Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1102239imu; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7GX8Oh8ceNw7MjLJb0LxQPG4MBJZGsbGzzFbFB/+FCFKmrgnMnih285pYblHTCjZlxaXvP X-Received: by 2002:a65:6645:: with SMTP id z5mr12146282pgv.351.1548467405454; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548467405; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hhdwapg4HTUEP2WnCAYHNXfzhx5jpojV5zE4SOdqHr/jK+spshDpGNp8gmiJd03MZt p8hKN925OaQehhqGMss4t+K8JNataxwdDhHG45BjRjLuawUrotf8vFzsRZ2+JfLuBeMx cQTRSH6Eo/TATKJ0/gSpiXVwp3+FoyYbhZCbRHLuiS5OAJv8IoJWmLbLNsjXuHeCLPY3 eHLpD5zFOYUwsvbzvhB51npjR3qsna1q/7oUkhJP9gqRNi429c3kFdmGNXwLUsUXttCB R4dDOVXvKPgGLPhfBwZeJcbhd6qHslDnir052h5RUayG/KBDBSE0/Cy3v1hlPTyqWH+g FUCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=z31oC3yzCXeE8gwNzZb7c+UyH2VYUHaOsK2yTfHBL38=; b=0Smc6UonWDbX4WdK/60h0i60B7Dc8KmvEsIL+x6XIFe39iexkbV7zMYnJDKOL/h1yW EDcaYIzzh773VuBahfXfR7ShfGYNQ2uePdvI6rVscpaQOI3GlTKPvkOOB4sq5gNhTs/B 3SlkegGUFfeP410TewKGDI4/me8/5s6rYNpklAix2Xr+RrmNJ46sZUGekF38nwNeNun+ yjPFlrFvo44ICGXBS1pQwUH5B3KJTAbb6iNCHl0iEhWgi1mlu4Zj7iBFFjZOWqCrCxR4 AwgsuNne7QCDZJBpQjUcNey9RasM5sb4lqZQqDjapT/cVphp3DndDankkKNdWTWEM2ZN 3Mlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="mrXg/1Wk"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si26700751plv.258.2019.01.25.17.49.49; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="mrXg/1Wk"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728868AbfAZBt0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:49:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:34978 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725550AbfAZBt0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 20:49:26 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id s198so4925326pgs.2; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=z31oC3yzCXeE8gwNzZb7c+UyH2VYUHaOsK2yTfHBL38=; b=mrXg/1Wk6jQhvCIai+RxDFsBL9W9egTtNMpDrQt5qcqmpvPILdn7IRcwwd2iAT/kKV 46XrJIleLhD13kWeYOsrX36zdkZLpl1F+QYul9OpGMfCuFUyDQz96yuqR08m96BzcOCC 2wAkIibqR8+Rh7s1Oo8LCOuiB+DNS8jcLAll5CuLmMM2gdS5OrKmM+yzL+dBak8JfvAA sEX8PFDmp9vXMIqIEpeiUgukkaeJxrxeIYOuaGqhoorbU/CPkFGvGo3RFyxhJ67qnz2A oL/n2yLk2+RqItbiY3vlXIjPONMtDn8yIkjM3NS1nUewE2r8PDmLHFUvCAsmVPVhozZN eDkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=z31oC3yzCXeE8gwNzZb7c+UyH2VYUHaOsK2yTfHBL38=; b=XKGCzN5XQPDBapyeAk7Wb+0zCGKi0wRU511ykksVg4P9tVcIPO+AE01T4XmN9cy5Hs Epg++hYxgy+ISy86ZgOfjRvSkHkOBnygnC3LEykFQXr4VUg89DefWuPTJY9vr1h4zdKV TcYWgBgspuvQoOqGR9jfVBkXNxohKIA+L9/PRcc17biMq+lYalpUyiYuFjBTLyuL7Fev uzViV+XU9SVOJ/cSp/ipnANzLhGcoPiwRVBAv3W6SS4SI1MfLeFECTRzkdzCp8kjHJP6 okhrNhA6Pgwy2mFUSQpbbWs97UHXNEbglvUxyfplsyFntQIA/kOiNlj3fM0qoaXv/jt2 Cm6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeS0JdwlX8Yh3TFIhN8pOavcTZP09aCBi8nNkvO6a34hiMe3Hdb P3H2CgGuwSvfUOMeJoGscPc= X-Received: by 2002:a63:4d:: with SMTP id 74mr12263296pga.248.1548467365246; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com (thunderhill.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o66sm42745234pgo.75.2019.01.25.17.49.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:49:19 -0800 From: Nicolin Chen To: Viorel Suman , Rob Herring Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Timur Tabi , Xiubo Li , Fabio Estevam , "S.j. Wang" , Daniel Baluta , Cosmin Samoila , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , dl-linux-imx , Viorel Suman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ASoC: add fsl_audmix DT binding documentation Message-ID: <20190126014918.GA2617@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> References: <1547729177-14317-1-git-send-email-viorel.suman@nxp.com> <1547729177-14317-3-git-send-email-viorel.suman@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1547729177-14317-3-git-send-email-viorel.suman@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:46:29PM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote: > + - dais : Must contain a list of phandles to AUDMIX connected > + DAIs. The current implementation requires two phandles > + to SAI interfaces to be provided, the first SAI in the > + list being used to route the AUDMIX output. Another small thing, that I just noticed, is this list. It forces the first input source to be the output source without giving any chance. I feel that we could have some flexibility here: one node for two input sources, and one node for the output source. Well, there is no critical problem with the current binding since it follows the SoC design. Yet I doubt if this routing logic will never break. Any suggestion, Rob?