Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261390AbUCDBig (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:38:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261377AbUCDBig (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:38:36 -0500 Received: from ns1.feral.com ([192.67.166.1]:8712 "EHLO ns1.feral.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261390AbUCDBid (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:38:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:38:29 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@quaver.in1.lcl Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "Bailey, Scott" cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: [BUG?] Recent feral ISP interaction with alpha dma In-Reply-To: <7FD257BF8564D4119DA800508BDF07AA0FB51ED8@USAHM012.amer.corp.eds.com> Message-ID: <20040303172418.W58994@quaver.in1.lcl> References: <7FD257BF8564D4119DA800508BDF07AA0FB51ED8@USAHM012.amer.corp.eds.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3308 Lines: 91 Thanks for spotting this... Hmm- I guess I never really asked anyone what sg_dma_len was supposed to apply to. The best comment about this seems to be in the mips header /* * These macros should be used after a pci_map_sg call has been done * to get bus addresses of each of the SG entries and their lengths. * You should only work with the number of sg entries pci_map_sg * returns, or alternatively stop on the first sg_dma_len(sg) which * is 0. */ So- I believe I'm using it correctly (well, not quite as I'm not checking for a length of zero) - I call pci_map_sg, and for each platform I should be using sg_dma_len- after all, there may be architectures which don't have sg->length. The scatterlist code in sg_classify isn't quite what you need to look at- this sets up some kind of private scheme in alpha which then gets decoded into an output list in sg_fill where it looks like more dma_length entries get filled than the 'leader'. I just gave away my Alphaserver 4100, but I know that the 2.4.18 kernels used to work with my stuff on it- I wonder what the real issue is? On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bailey, Scott wrote: > Here's a weird problem for which I maybe have an answer except I'm not sure > if it's right. Hopefully the "many eyes" safety net will stop me from doing > anything truly stupid. :-) > > I have an Alphaserver 4100 where I have been testing a build of kernel > 2.4.24 with the most recent snapshot of the feral isp driver. (A previous > release of the driver, patched onto 2.4.22, is running great but I want to > get onto the newer kernel.) > > The system boots happily enough, but eventually I start seeing sequences of: > > pci_map_sg failed: could not allocate dma page tables > isp2: unable to dma map request > > and processes start wedging. > > After poking around in the source, I am suspecting my problem in the feral > isp_pci.c:tdma_mk() where a little snippet goes: > > while (resid > 0) { > nseg++; > resid -= sg_dma_len(sg); > sg++; > } > > The previous (working) version of this code is: > > while (resid > 0) { > nseg++; > resid -= sg->length; > sg++; > } > > The problem is, that looking at arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c:sg_classify() > in the recent 2.4 kernels, I see that sg->dma_length only gets filled in for > scatterlist elements that are leaders. I suspect the non-leader elements > contain crud that confuse the resid count in unpredictable ways. > > The question for everybody: is it better to fix this by reverting the > isp_pci.c stuff to refer to sg->length again instead of sg->dma_length, so > that I'm always referencing a valid quantity, or should I tweak pci_iommu.c > so it sets this value to 0 for non-leader elements (and ignore the fact that > code may still not be paying attention to sg->dma_address before making > decisions about the element)? > > I couldn't figure out what other architectures were doing from sniffing > around the other directories. > > What will break the least? :-) > > Thanks, > > Scott Bailey > scott bailey eds com > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/