Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1934731imu; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:41:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5a5fcsFE2q06woFJ6+XhJweVZQNqKR9mz0I6+Hzzlj8sqWcRAIg712usSNiqiq4caytZJb X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f89:: with SMTP id t131mr14999835pgb.26.1548542506443; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:41:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548542506; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BuiDISijUtHrmhy4YYBlhSX3gnl1hrta8UfKi3tmZvgE9fec7Dk6OOEzaD470gPPhH 8Zli1b7wc3PWjPGOohta8epsRfHx2tgRzj3sjUfpQJXNI5nt5qzjCgF35ncxrlPvXMLs GgW2GEnrGiIY3Ykpt5g+nfZEcrnADBQWBeR0lvzYg3AfpjCacHwpGjsdU5OAoLMdYYNw UUR7/kgggEinOdZO22cBtM1mxkzPvEskdKltPSmoLrZ1UFxEuPp3snS2QvzOjeffCGyR 6FM1Dk/Y5PiiO9AHtN3M/moPoGab7H7vmnLYAcoScYRlJHF1Cg+laEBemRsMH5+sgbT2 Pj6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=sf660wcyDxVzvK5uZXhQ4HwjsYsE9bK+jHFT1yjWV4U=; b=XNyTIa6GSPXGCqGE6Gf+Ek3bzdjoMYT9tZ87kauNNsSlw6gNodI6Tl7s1L5NVMJPrV 9F1a+vMaHoYnQr3PXtg5b5Li7xk8U4mojBuiWi3iZB4lIaxxWukAUNdIfZGKkDFsEzAm ZRq2K+Kcw8Pw5jKXzMqU5qf57L+KOoZevfhtFVJbfRjZv9LLYC5nAPp1HPsSekJOYeIT 1LhuLFzvqDoE0LOHEHmvnLl+vC0qgTBEKOPcYUUdrLqEaZVn20a8C7XkdWy7OJgMrx5T kbHIPpYWlXZNSRekbmFmV6kZiT/Ou1dOBcCoVgrz23zo39I3BnuMR+hXUYZzTkijPI/k DukQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v185si9602248pfb.65.2019.01.26.14.41.26; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:41:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726407AbfAZWhM (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:37:12 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:57774 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726197AbfAZWhM (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:37:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::bf5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ACF9108F04AE; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:37:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:37:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20190126.143708.1203048880266877709.davem@davemloft.net> To: jasowang@redhat.com Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 0/5] vhost: accelerate metadata access through vmap() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20190123095557.30168-1-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <20190123095557.30168-1-jasowang@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:37:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jason Wang Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:55:52 +0800 > This series tries to access virtqueue metadata through kernel virtual > address instead of copy_user() friends since they had too much > overheads like checks, spec barriers or even hardware feature > toggling. > > Test shows about 24% improvement on TX PPS. It should benefit other > cases as well. I've read over the discussion of patch #5 a few times. And it seems to me that, at a minimum, a few things still need to be resolved: 1) More perf data added to commit message. 2) Whether invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end() must be paired. Etc. So I am marking this series "Changes Requested".