Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2788452imu; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:10:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4VpdkYPsSHmUAAJ+X9WWk/c/xO9YgjdVDM++zHoOB5P46Clpxtub80B3/4PRueS4HFWqQN X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8758:: with SMTP id g24mr19115938pfo.250.1548623434721; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:10:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548623434; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g7fr+zQOGpOTZICka+5k+LzNwrSvGgzeF00XkR4ZaJYeSCcWNyP6aNxvO5YINCEjrv P4htWSyBpxa+IRFQ+IWIdrBQSftUpIBNkJR1jypbmI3CE4yD9guZ8wh7A2gQM85nShW2 V1TI2SR5fz9bZDwr5AneAZH0F0zNW4SbkXBu5EegKZWfnZcMdbBbe/79o5xMy4SCc3tX xW325gENhFbrVjhTJeWhzi9+f0JAoYRH7Ky36SVxeQ/Qpd/U5Sz789kKZeSE5Qcm1cZU q+Sk6WBcFnY5s1Vosv7SCdR82MVw2F8qq/LnCMVqpYWoo8cZigUKTchHIXSmfjFo48aD cuAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date; bh=2iIZPe9NePxCKGizvnxbcS4KQjL0jTdmhkhtDOd42vE=; b=wBW5TJONgN2b4jwgQqD4wSyR4FsaHYNtuI7QUytQI2MUN+t9F70j+CT46cpkubH6Qv VfawyHV3K9CwDpnHNfppLB+5I4foqtfy0Gh/MUE92/esipIq+QuAqU/lUrgDsBOPbypQ /lB1DvghHhffmBfN2CG3ZD6AjY4CaeMjsNqHiGGG+wrCXA+nCvpW14ikyipDqU8eP0CM 1gUDFHuJckZUcT+TNYvTdazU70pRFFqGI/X1+Ks/cR5AVIXswBBZSfXIHvvpiZ3hL7YY u8c45tj70hYcSmCIbd1vj3PII9GWZ8uYoyIJsxV62u5rBMwKctZWKzZ2kMyE5rL0VQbg Golw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a124si9344349pfb.263.2019.01.27.13.10.19; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727496AbfA0VJd (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:09:33 -0500 Received: from bout01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.11.15]:40530 "EHLO bout01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726920AbfA0VJc (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:09:32 -0500 Received: from mx02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.212]) by bout01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gnrgJ-0001uf-7K; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 14:09:31 -0700 Received: from plesk14-shared.xmission.com ([166.70.198.161] helo=plesk14.xmission.com) by mx02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gnrgI-0000bt-RG; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 14:09:31 -0700 Received: from hacktheplanet (c-68-50-23-202.hsd1.in.comcast.net [68.50.23.202]) by plesk14.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F612217DC3; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:09:23 -0500 From: Scott Bauer To: David Kozub Cc: Jens Axboe , Jonathan Derrick , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Rabenstein Message-ID: <20190127210922.GN21149@hacktheplanet> References: <1548196307-12987-1-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> <1548196307-12987-15-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1548196307-12987-15-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-XM-SPF: eid=1gnrgI-0000bt-RG;;;mid=<20190127210922.GN21149@hacktheplanet>;;;hst=mx02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.198.161;;;frm=sbauer@plzdonthack.me;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.198.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sbauer@plzdonthack.me X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,XMSubLong,XM_UncommonTLD01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4991] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.5 XM_UncommonTLD01 Less-common TLD * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;David Kozub X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 210 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.6 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 1.75 (0.8%), parse: 0.78 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (6.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.77 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (9.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.22 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 17 (8.1%), check_bayes: 16 (7.4%), b_tokenize: 4.8 (2.3%), b_tok_get_all: 4.8 (2.3%), b_comp_prob: 1.61 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.5 (1.2%), b_finish: 0.67 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 136 (64.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.51 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.6 (1.2%), poll_dns_idle: 0.95 (0.5%), tests_pri_10: 4.5 (2.1%), tests_pri_500: 12 (5.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/16] block: sed-opal: pass steps via argument rather than via opal_dev X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Fri, 13 May 2016 17:07:30 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:31:45PM +0100, David Kozub wrote: > The steps argument is only read by the next function, so it can > be passed directly as an argument rather than via opal_dev. > > Normally, the steps is an array on the stack, so the pointer stops > being valid then the function that set opal_dev.steps returns. > If opal_dev.steps was not set to NULL before return it would become > a dangling pointer. When the steps are passed as argument this > becomes easier to see and more difficult to misuse. > > Signed-off-by: David Kozub Reviewed-by: Scott Bauer