Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:30:25 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VM patches in 2.6.4-rc1-mm2
Message-Id: <20040303193025.68a16dc4.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <40469E50.6090401@matchmail.com>
References: <20040302201536.52c4e467.akpm@osdl.org>
	<40469E50.6090401@matchmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 945
Lines: 26

Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4-rc1/2.6.4-rc1-mm2/
> > 
> > - More VM tweaks and tuneups
> 
> Running 2.6.3-lofft-snsus-264rc1mm2vm (nfsd loff_t, sunrpc locking & -mm 
> VM patches).  Seems to be working well.

OK, good.

> Most of the previous 2.6 kernels I was running on these servers would be 
> lightly hitting swap by now.  This definitely looks better to me.

It sounds worse to me.  "Lightly hitting swap" is good.  It gets rid of stuff,
freeing up physical memory.

But I do not see a lot of difference here.  The 900MB desktop machine is
300M into swap after 24 hours.  That's usual.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/