Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:33:41 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] MIPS: SGI-IP27: clean up bridge access and header
 files
Message-ID: <20190128133341.GA5140@infradead.org>
References: <20190124174728.28812-1-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
 <20190124174728.28812-3-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
 <20190128132003.GA744@infradead.org>
 <20190128142440.591d2115ac7844863713aa77@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190128142440.591d2115ac7844863713aa77@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 02:24:40PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> I totally agreed. I only moved the original defintion around while cleaning
> up the header file. Right now there is no code using it. Should I remove it
> and access macros as soon there is a need for it ?

Sounds good.