Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3564523imu; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:05:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4WQOr74P8UP7LKvLyzzZG97EAginfKZzFfrzVdVzi7//hmnyYnaZer8GPQ3lrSBoNyfgi3 X-Received: by 2002:a62:3adc:: with SMTP id v89mr21850765pfj.109.1548687919937; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:05:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548687919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JxJ+hDA+ZgbIRaNbSsb7+DA85ujRhl6Tq5RUaizbpc5buKY31TYM7gvVrWWn63A7ap yZn6Oic1bT0n1vrl5l92h12o6ItQ9KtMUeyU7eXdlhai5qaVX/zp8p8jW/QfF0TJQQxU t1pkbnRSJrDvCOdNrtMyT4R+r+17mddkIb8CCXAgDMtK5GZNieZCjjDF4YJC7aePRV0F K0f3Ru3KpjK8J2hq6m7typs32d7nl45FIMrnj+UMaat/fQmmVdIQTGZVN/2SHLrNz+jk GLDxRaE+nlnPrVKXTrk03UoxVgF/w/AVCwUZglmc6YfAf/CkiF18gDp8NYXSmpsIDBVq U08Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=VOXf0hMxWjyUXAhr8eIn+MlEQx9klLzP1T4Xz3Mu4YE=; b=Qdlui5LGIjBIa2gV7n3AVkC5nJzcOy29UOpiB2X5aEDJJ/iRZ/Nvp7CN9ffLtZM5Cx e8CkxmKqB5y3C9SGy/Lvj6Pvy0TaI59pVfhVfyuyvq4akEaY7FqHIA7t6xC4srmRh477 gqxbjH6fdY78WCK9SwGcqu+GNzWpxv9vpWcPBGKVOhZhMoOM3k27ylgNb/dWG98XhzwS PVb3uW4GZtYAkuh82QNGQVj4erZ5g2484EtwjE0owXFGUKiXeuPhLlkd1UpvM0/tD0V1 8+U+HnDoyT1LxSt6S71/r5jnNjQRh2gbxNVAEZOSnql4dL5nr21F6twOH3xm0aBoPTop iIcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e6si1183437pgl.471.2019.01.28.07.05.02; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726934AbfA1PEb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:04:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53982 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726738AbfA1PEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:04:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BF07F6CB; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xps (ovpn-116-106.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.106]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47ADA6247D; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:04:20 -0500 From: Rafael Aquini To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Naoya Horiguchi , Jan Kara , Andrea Arcangeli , Dominik Brodowski , Matthew Wilcox , Vratislav Bendel Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: migrate: don't rely on PageMovable() of newpage after unlocking it Message-ID: <20190128150420.GB10872@xps> References: <20190128121609.9528-1-david@redhat.com> <20190128130709.GJ18811@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190128132146.GK18811@dhcp22.suse.cz> <17e7d7e4-f4ca-a681-93e5-92a0c285be14@redhat.com> <20190128133514.GL18811@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190128150156.GA10872@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190128150156.GA10872@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:01:56AM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 03:38:38PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 28.01.19 14:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 28-01-19 14:22:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > >> On 28.01.19 14:21, Michal Hocko wrote: > > >>> On Mon 28-01-19 14:14:28, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > >>>> On 28.01.19 14:07, Michal Hocko wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon 28-01-19 13:16:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > >>>>> [...] > > >>>>>> My theory: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> In __unmap_and_move(), we lock the old and newpage and perform the > > >>>>>> migration. In case of vitio-balloon, the new page will become > > >>>>>> movable, the old page will no longer be movable. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> However, after unlocking newpage, I think there is nothing stopping > > >>>>>> the newpage from getting dequeued and freed by virtio-balloon. This > > >>>>>> will result in the newpage > > >>>>>> 1. No longer having PageMovable() > > >>>>>> 2. Getting moved to the local list before finally freeing it (using > > >>>>>> page->lru) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Does that mean that the virtio-balloon can change the Movable state > > >>>>> while there are other users of the page? Can you point to the code that > > >>>>> does it? How come this can be safe at all? Or is the PageMovable stable > > >>>>> only under the page lock? > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> PageMovable is stable under the lock. The relevant instructions are in > > >>>> > > >>>> mm/balloon_compaction.c and include/linux/balloon_compaction.h > > >>> > > >>> OK, I have just checked __ClearPageMovable and it indeed requires > > >>> PageLock. Then we also have to move is_lru = __PageMovable(page) after > > >>> the page lock. > > >>> > > >> > > >> I assume that is fine as is as the page is isolated? (yes, it will be > > >> modified later when moving but we are interested in the original state) > > > > > > OK, I've missed that the page is indeed isolated. Then the patch makes > > > sense to me. > > > > > > > Thanks Michal. I assume this has broken ever since balloon compaction > > was introduced. I'll wait a little more and then resend as !RFC with a > > cc-stable tag. > > > > Yes, balloon deflation could always race against migration > This race was a problem, initially, and was dealt with, via: > > commit 117aad1e9e4d97448d1df3f84b08bd65811e6d6a > Author: Rafael Aquini > Date: Mon Sep 30 13:45:16 2013 -0700 > > mm: avoid reinserting isolated balloon pages into LRU lists > > > > I think this upstream patch has re-introduced it, in a more subtle way, > as we're stumbling on it now, again: > > commit d6d86c0a7f8ddc5b38cf089222cb1d9540762dc2 > Author: Konstantin Khlebnikov > Date: Thu Oct 9 15:29:27 2014 -0700 > > mm/balloon_compaction: redesign ballooned pages management > > > > On this particular race against migration case, virtio ballon deflation would > not see it before > > commit b1123ea6d3b3da25af5c8a9d843bd07ab63213f4 > Author: Minchan Kim > Date: Tue Jul 26 15:23:09 2016 -0700 > > mm: balloon: use general non-lru movable page feature > > as the recently released balloon page would be post-processed > without the page->lru list handling, which for migration stability > purposes must be done under the protection of page_lock. > > missing part here: I think your patch adresses this new case. Acked-by: Rafael Aquini > get rid of balloon reference count. ^^ this was a left over (sorry about my fat-fingers) > > > -- Rafael