Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:19:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:19:42 -0500 Received: from [216.151.155.116] ([216.151.155.116]:24590 "EHLO belphigor.mcnaught.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 15:19:26 -0500 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: modular kernel In-Reply-To: <3A047B17.EEF036A6@onetelnet.fr> From: Doug McNaught Date: 04 Nov 2000 15:19:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: FORT David's message of "Sat, 04 Nov 2000 22:09:43 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org FORT David writes: > Taco Witte wrote: > > I think it's a very good idea, because it would make it easier to > > get more people work at the same moment, development would go > > faster. It would be possible to make groups for a certain part of > > the kernel (for example sound, or filesystems, or main) with own > > group pages with status info and todo's and own mailinglists (it > > would divide this enourmous flow of mail into smaller parts). It > > would decrease the download size. I believe it would make bug > > tracking easier as well. I'm sure I forgot to mention something.. > Looks like the beginning of a new flame war. s/a new/an old and well-trodden/ HTH. -Doug - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/