Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261845AbUCDOJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:09:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261914AbUCDOJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:09:42 -0500 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:31874 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261845AbUCDOJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:09:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:11:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Rolf Eike Beer cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPLv2 or not GPLv2? (no license bashing) In-Reply-To: <200403040838.31412.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> Message-ID: References: <200403040838.31412.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2019 Lines: 48 On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Hi all, > > just digging a bit in the kernel and found some funny things: > > -there is a tag only for "GPL v2" but there are some drivers claiming to be > v2 and not using this (patch will follow) > -there are some drivers with the comment ", either version 2 of the License." > in the header. s/either // ? If so, there are some more files where someone > should change MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") to "GPL v2". I don't think anybody, but the original author, can change the licensing or its symbology. In other words, if there is a MODULE_LICENSE("ZORK"), that stays until it is changed by the author that inserted it initially. In fact, a review of Linux history by a first-year law student may show that somebody, not the original author, added the MODULE_LICENSE() macro to a lot of modules that didn't have any such macro, and thereby assigned some license that did not previously exist! Such an implied license may not be valid because the original author of the work did not perform that assignment. I think you need to be vigilant and not fall into the RMS trap where anything that is "found" anywhere, automatically becomes the property of GPL. It will invalidate the original spirit and nature of GPL and, likely throw all such works into the public domain. Caution is necessary, especially now that there is a Wind River-Red Hat connection, and other such connections being established in the future. Wind River was the company that "bought" BSD/OS. I don't know how you do that -- Anyway, be very careful about changing what might have been the original author's intent. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.24 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/