Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:02:45 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     robert shteynfeld <robert.shteynfeld@gmail.com>,
        Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
        Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
        Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: kernel panic due to
 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2830bf6f05fb3e05bc4743274b806c821807a684
Message-ID: <20190128190245.GV18811@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20190125081924.GF3560@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20190125082952.GG3560@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CADfvbxqOOt_07hyeReEH_gCmTxxMYJr0-CSkqdX57wGTWisNTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190125155810.GQ3560@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CADfvbxp8sER_Xjkm-g8+BH87Ne8oUBirSWx6mmL=Z3XwyYoQHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190125163938.GA20411@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20190125173315.GC20411@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20190125181549.GE20411@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20190128114358.GH18811@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <CAHk-=wh3iWk6nu1u2OZ9JeyM-aJ_nCm1tMihPir8Yu3Q08f4aA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh3iWk6nu1u2OZ9JeyM-aJ_nCm1tMihPir8Yu3Q08f4aA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 28-01-19 10:42:25, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:44 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Linus, could you take the revert please?
> >
> > or should I post the patch as a reply to make your life easier?
> 
> I've taken that revert now, but yes, in general, it's much better if a
> patch is sent separately from the discussion as a very explicit patch
> (ie subject line has that usual "[PATCH] ..." format etc) simply
> because I get too much email and I can often miss things otherwise.
> Particularly inside a thread where the developers are discussing
> things, I go "ah, good, things are still being discussed" without
> looking any closer into the details.

Sure, I usually do it that way. I was just awaiting some review feedback
on the changelog first.

> That's particularly true when traveling - I only noticed this one on
> this second reminder email.. I'm home now, but Friday, when you sent
> it originally, was 45 hours long for me with 24 hours on airplanes and
> airports, so I had entirely missed the original email back then.

No problem. Andrew has already queued it as well so I guess he simply
drops it when it reaches your tree.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs