Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:39:48 +0100
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To:     Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Filter out hidden symbols from labels
Message-ID: <20190129113948.GK4344@kernel.org>
References: <20190115135354.11572-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
 <960f0b83-a623-67a6-ab55-d56139d10ba2@redhat.com>
 <20190115173838.GB31411@krava>
 <20190128133526.GD15461@krava>
 <20190129090750.GE4344@kernel.org>
 <83e6ed5c-47b8-9499-af18-5ada0c4bdd6c@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <83e6ed5c-47b8-9499-af18-5ada0c4bdd6c@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Em Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:25:35AM +0000, Nick Clifton escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> >> there were no objections for rfc, sending patch
> > 
> > I don't see a problem, Nick, can you provide an Acked-by, or better yet,
> > a Reviewed-by so that Jiri can collect in this patch and I can push it
> > to perf/urgent?
> 
> Sorry - I do not think that I have the authority to do that.  I am not a
> perftools maintainer (or a kernel maintainer).  For what it is worth the 
> patch does look good to me, but I think that a real maintainer needs to 
> approve it.

Ok, I was more thinking about this part of
Documentation/process/submittingpatches.txt:

----------------------------
Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:.  It is a record that the acker
has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.  Hence patch
mergers will sometimes manually convert an acker's "yep, looks good to me"
into an Acked-by: (but note that it is usually better to ask for an
explicit ack).
----------------------------

But its ok, if you still don't feel this should be added, I'll just
leave a Cc: you, ok?

- Arnaldo