Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:38:24 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@sweptlaser.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] hwmon: (lm85) add LM96000 high freqency pwm support
Message-ID: <20190129233824.GA27719@roeck-us.net>
References: <20190129212920.27921-1-jgebben@sweptlaser.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190129212920.27921-1-jgebben@sweptlaser.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:29:17PM -0700, Jeremy Gebben wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch adds support for the PWM frequencies from 22.5 to 30 kHz
> available on the LM96000.
> 
> It looks like this chip has been supported for a long time, but wasn't
> mentioned in the docs (which I have updated).
> 
> Also, it has been using the generic 'lm85' prefix, which I have not
> changed to avoid breaking userspace or device tree files. AFAICT,
> lm85_detect() will only return 'lm85' for LM96000 chips, so it doesn't
> look like you can get a bare 'lm85' prefix with any other chips.
> 
> I stumbled on to a 10 year old thread discussing a patch which looks
> like an early attempt to add support for this chip, which may be of
> interest:
> https://lm-sensors.lm-sensors.narkive.com/1SIwaMDT/patch-hwmon-lm96000-support
> 
> Thanks for reviewing,
> 
Where are the actual patches ?

Guenter