Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:28:43 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
cc:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/livepatch: reliable stack unwinder fixes
In-Reply-To: <87y372pc75.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1901301427320.6626@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
References: <20190122155724.27557-1-joe.lawrence@redhat.com> <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1901300049470.6626@cbobk.fhfr.pm> <87y372pc75.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> I'm happy to take it, unless there's some reason you'd rather it go via 
> the LP tree?

As this is more about reliable stack unwinding than live patching per se 
(which is only a user of that facility), I'd actually slightly prefer if 
it goes via your tree.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs