Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 11:46:26 -0500
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt
Message-ID: <20190130164626.GA17841@cmpxchg.org>
References: <20190129225218.15441-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 <20190129230845.GG28773@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190129230845.GG28773@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:08:45AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:52:18PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > "Resource Control" is a very broad term for this CPU feature, and a
> > term that is also associated with containers, cgroups etc. This can
> > easily cause confusion.
> > 
> > Make the user prompt more specific.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > As somebody who works in "resource control", this prompt in oldconfig
> > certainly had me go wtf. Can we do something more specific?
> 
> Well, since this is an interface to a hardware feature, we could call it
> 
> Hardware Resource Control
> 
> for example. I.e., HW_RESCTRL.
> 
> Linus had another suggestion - CPU_RESCTRL - which sounds ok to me too.
> 
> > Not insisting on this name, and I haven't renamed all the config
> > symbols yet, but we should probably fix this before 5.0 is released.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 26387c7bf305..426677b759c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ config RETPOLINE
> >  	  support for full protection. The kernel may run slower.
> >  
> >  config X86_RESCTRL
> > -	bool "Resource Control support"
> > +	bool "x86 cache control support"
> 
> Except that it is not only cache but memory (bandwidth) control too. So I guess
> 
> 	bool "CPU Resource Control support"

This is still awefully close to the cgroup CPU resource
controller. Since it's more hardware-specific, and the config symbol
also has the x86 in it, how about "x86 CPU resource control support"?

---

From 2a24f6e30ed9dbc0abb96c73ec0e205e07034383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:44:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] x86: avoid confusion over the new RESCTRL config prompt

"Resource Control" is a very broad term for this CPU feature, and a
term that is also associated with containers, cgroups etc. This can
easily cause confusion.

Make the user prompt more specific.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 26387c7bf305..ac432379df11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ config RETPOLINE
 	  support for full protection. The kernel may run slower.
 
 config X86_RESCTRL
-	bool "Resource Control support"
+	bool "x86 CPU resource control support"
 	depends on X86 && (CPU_SUP_INTEL || CPU_SUP_AMD)
 	select KERNFS
 	help
-	  Enable Resource Control support.
+	  Enable x86 CPU resource control support.
 
 	  Provide support for the allocation and monitoring of system resources
 	  usage by the CPU.
-- 
2.20.1