Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/64s: Clear on-stack exception marker upon exception return
References: <20190122155724.27557-1-joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
        <20190122155724.27557-2-joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
        <87tvhqpbzd.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:18:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87tvhqpbzd.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (Michael Ellerman's
        message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:27:02 +1100")
Message-ID: <87a7jirrn6.fsf@suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:

> Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> writes:
>> From: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
>>
>> The ppc64 specific implementation of the reliable stacktracer,
>> save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(), bails out and reports an "unreliable
>> trace" whenever it finds an exception frame on the stack. Stack frames
>> are classified as exception frames if the STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER magic,
>> as written by exception prologues, is found at a particular location.
>>
>> However, as observed by Joe Lawrence, it is possible in practice that
>> non-exception stack frames can alias with prior exception frames and thus,
>> that the reliable stacktracer can find a stale STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER on
>> the stack. It in turn falsely reports an unreliable stacktrace and blocks
>> any live patching transition to finish. Said condition lasts until the
>> stack frame is overwritten/initialized by function call or other means.
>>
>> In principle, we could mitigate this by making the exception frame
>> classification condition in save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() stronger:
>> in addition to testing for STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER, we could also take into
>> account that for all exceptions executing on the kernel stack
>> - their stack frames's backlink pointers always match what is saved
>>   in their pt_regs instance's ->gpr[1] slot and that
>> - their exception frame size equals STACK_INT_FRAME_SIZE, a value
>>   uncommonly large for non-exception frames.
>>
>> However, while these are currently true, relying on them would make the
>> reliable stacktrace implementation more sensitive towards future changes in
>> the exception entry code. Note that false negatives, i.e. not detecting
>> exception frames, would silently break the live patching consistency model.
>>
>> Furthermore, certain other places (diagnostic stacktraces, perf, xmon)
>> rely on STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER as well.
>>
>> Make the exception exit code clear the on-stack STACK_FRAME_REGS_MARKER
>> for those exceptions running on the "normal" kernel stack and returning
>> to kernelspace: because the topmost frame is ignored by the reliable stack
>> tracer anyway, returns to userspace don't need to take care of clearing
>> the marker.
>>
>> Furthermore, as I don't have the ability to test this on Book 3E or
>> 32 bits, limit the change to Book 3S and 64 bits.
>>
>> Finally, make the HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE Kconfig option depend on
>> PPC_BOOK3S_64 for documentation purposes. Before this patch, it depended
>> on PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN and because CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN implies
>> PPC_BOOK3S_64, there's no functional change here.
>
> That has nothing to do with the fix and should really be in a separate
> patch.
>
> I can split it when applying.

If you don't mind, that would be nice! Or simply drop that
chunk... Otherwise, let me know if I shall send a split v2 for this
patch [1/4] only.

Thanks,

Nicolai

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)